Yes, the Second Industrial Revolution did differ from the first<span> in some important ways. ... The </span>Second Industrial Revolution<span> was about electricity and chemicals and petroleum and all the things that can be made and consumed using these. The</span>First<span> was about textiles and coal and iron. A worldwide economy.</span>
According to Daniel Webster, the individual states had the right to nullify the law. He preached this idea on the Senate floor, stating that states should have the right to be able to practice nullification.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The above description contrast with early mining operations in the American West in that the formerly conditions of the old west were completely different than the "beautiful hills, waving fields of grass, prancing mule deer, a glimmering lake . . ." description by T.H. Watkins.
Indeed, it was the opposite. American settlers that decided to bet on the west and the "gold fever," found difficult conditions and economic hardships. That was not an easy time and required extra work to find the gold.
And let's have in mind that many people that went to the west were people that have been suffering from the difficult conditions in the Plains during the so-called "Dust Bowl" period in which drought and the lack of rain killed animals and affect the production of crops.
Fifth amendment of the United States constitution.
