There would be no body to interpret laws, there would be a huge flaw in the checks and balance system of the governemt, and there would be issues in there being no difference in those who catch criminals and those who judge guilt (IE no one would decide if the guilty party was rightfully arrested, etc)
Where’s the text or highlighted clues?
the Ohio law violated Brandenburg's right to free speech. The Supreme Court ruled that the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Statute ignored whether or not the advocacy it criminalized actually led to imminent lawless action. The Court held that hate speech is protected under the First Amendment as long as it does not incite violence.
Answer:
George Washington
Explanation:
General George Washington led the American army to victory during the Revolutionary War. Despite having little practical experience in managing large, conventional armies, Washington proved to be a capable and resilient leader of the American military forces during the Revolutionary War.
Oh I remember this yeah give me a second I will help
