The Egyptians and Mayans both used symbols to convey meaning in written language. However, the similarity pretty much stops there. This is remarkable, though, considering the fact that these cultures – millennia and worlds apart – developed similar writing systems.
The Egyptian hieroglyphics didn’t have punctuation and they were written in long lines of script. They were found on everything from paper, to stone, to jewelry. Reading the glyphs, you go from left to right. Egyptian glyphs are divided into phonograms - representing sounds and ideograms - representing ideas or objects.
The Mayans’ system used picture blocks to convey meaning. Their glyphs were mostly on stone. Reading the glyphs is very different from reading Egyptian glyphs. You go left to right and read a “pair” of glyphs and then go down to the next line and read the next pair. They form a sort of a zig-zag pattern. Thus, if reading, you would read block 1A, then block 1B. Then you go to the next line and read 2A, then block 2B. Mayan glyphs are divided into logograms to express meaning or syllabograms to represent sounds.
Answer:
Businesses can take advantage of favorable laws to make products cheaply.
Businesses can take advantage of favorable taxes to make products cheaply.
Businesses can take advantage of new forms of technology to make products cheaply.
Businesses can take advantage of faster technology to make products faster.
1,2,3,5
Explanation:
Hope u had a great day
The first is the best option.
It is true that a lot of cultural aspects of Africa have been lost, most specifically, religion.
If we look at imperialism, its height came after the main period of African slave trade (second answer is false).
The tribal conflicts are still very ripe in Africa, and often they're fueled by the carefulness boundary drawing of countries in Africa- the third answer is false.
More self-rule is also false, if anything, imperialism brought less self-rule
<span>Benjamin Butler was one of the first officials. He felt that the runaway slaves could be considered "contraband" and, as such, did not have to be returned to their masters. He felt that the Union could keep them and use them as soldiers if they so chose.</span>
Answer:
heyy hii it's me I'm going to be your good friend❤️
