Answer: option 3
Explanation:
Background to the case:
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
Basis of analysis:
Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?
Rule of the court:
There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.
Discretion is expected to be used.
The answer for this question is True
In the district courts there are... pleadings, motions, scheduling conference and order, discovery, pretrial conference and order, trial, and appeal. A plaintiff commences a civil case by filing a complaint with the court
Answer:
i dont get it, is there a question?
Explanation:
Answer:
Total cost is equal to $81300
So option (c) will be correct answer.
Explanation:
Actual unit of production = 42000
Cost of per equivalent material = $1.10
Equivalent cost of material = 
$
Equivalent cost of labor = 
$
Therefore total cost of production = $46200+$35100 = $81300
So total cost will be $81300
Therefore option (c) is the correct answer
