1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kifflom [539]
3 years ago
13

What effect did population growth have on the conflict between colonists and Native Americans?

History
2 answers:
Darina [25.2K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The effect that an increase in population growth, especially of colonists, had on the conflict existent between colonists and Native American peoples, was that it increased the problem even more, particularly because colonists began to demand more and more land, and wished to have it from anywhere, without a consideration to anyone else.

Explanation

During colonial times, and as colonists both reproduced, and more arrived from Europe, conflicts arose with Native Americans basically because of the voracity of colonists for land and resources. This voracity pushed colonists to move into lands that were from Native American tribes, and as more arrived, even more lands were taken away from these tribes. Even though supposed laws and regulations were imposed on colonists to protect the rights of Native Americans, these laws and regultations were ignored by colonists, who still invaded Native lands. This increased the conflict and as the population of colonists grew, conflict also grew.

Anni [7]3 years ago
5 0
Increased problems. because as the colonist population grew the Native americans go pushed farther away to make room for new people and made natives feel anger towards colonists for taking so much of their land and not getting anything in return
You might be interested in
SERIOUSLY NEED HELP HOT 10 MINUTES LEFT!! PLS HELP I WILL GIVE BRANLIEST!! AT LEAST COME TAKE A LOOK!!! MY FINAL QUESTIONS!SERIO
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

28: A

29:no idea but if guessing I'd say mexicans or jews

Explanation:

ur in a hurry so no explanation

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Federalists were NOT supported by which of the following groups?
Svetach [21]

To understand what Federalists and Anti-Federalists are, you first have to understand the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States, this was created because the colonists felt like they needed a formal government. Although the Articles of Confederation did some good in some ways, it was a very bad article that gave little to no power to the federal government. This meant that the government could not tax the people, they had to ask states for the money, this made it so they could not pay debts or pay for wars. The Articles of Confederation also made it so the government could not enforce any laws, which obviously leads to people taking advantage of the system and doing crime for their own benefit. After awhile, people began to grow sick of this, and wanted a new constitution which gave power to the federal government. This is where Federalists and Anti-Federalists come along. Federalists, wanted a new constitution for the United States, and they felt the Articles of Confederation was too weak. Anti-Federalists, opposed a new constitution for the United States, they were scared if too much power fell into the federal government's hands, the same thing would happen with what happened with Great Britain, and would fall succumb to "taxation without representation", or other unfair occurrences. The Federalists were not supported by Anti-Federalists or any other group that did not want to altar or make a new constitution for the United States.

5 0
3 years ago
________translated the sanskrut tent of hitopadesh
VLD [36.1K]
Freiderich Max Muller

Pls give me a brainliest if this helped thx
7 0
3 years ago
A pioneer in the field of driverless cars is _____.
Paraphin [41]
A pioneer in the field of driverless car is google
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following experiences or strengths did LBJ bring to the presidency?
scoray [572]

Answer:

<u>the answers are:</u>

- LBJ wanted to be the best president ever.  

- People said that LBJ had a great deal of charm.  

- LBJ's congressional experience had taught him how to get bills passed by Congress.  

- LBJ was energetic and hard working.

Explanation

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mark the statement if it accurately describes New York A. To accommodate the population explosion, the city grew upward. B. Most
    12·2 answers
  • Why did u.s. general douglas macarthur leave his command of troops near the end of the korean war
    15·1 answer
  • What is the senates only defense to a fillbuster
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a fundamental limit on presidential power?
    10·1 answer
  • Why is South Carolina established as a colony?
    15·2 answers
  • Where in Europe are the Germanic languages mainly spoken?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did some new European govern-<br> ments survive and others fail during<br> the 1920s?
    15·1 answer
  • The nullification crisis that occurred between president andrew jackson and john calhoun would best be described as a debate ove
    6·2 answers
  • True or false Egypt's physical environment limited trade.
    12·1 answer
  • In what year did world war 1 start​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!