Answer:
The Cannon-Bard theory of emotion
Explanation:
According to the Cannon-Bard theory of emotion our emotions are the result of the thalamus sending a message to the brain as the body reacts to a stimulus.
Even if the person does not show a reaction, which is physical, emotions can be experienced. The reaction of the body and psychological emotion experienced happens at the same instant.
Here, Erica's body reacts psychologically and physically at the same time.
Hence this pattern of response would bolster the Cannon-Bard theory of emotion.
Answer:
The answer is "Option c".
Explanation:
The area around a city is an urban environment. Almost all of the urban residents pursue non-farm employment. Urban regions were significantly developed because the human constructions like houses, stores, highways, bridges, railways are highly densified. "Towns, cities, and suburbs may be called the urban area." The environment promotes a person to think comfortably. It promotes a community sense. Many liberal Protestants rejected Bible literalism and adapted religious concepts for modern society in the new urban context.
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
Answer:
Urea is a <u>nitrogenous</u> substance
Explanation:
Urea is a substance that is formed in the body during the processing of proteins and nitrogen compounds in the liver, and that we generally excrete through urine and sweat. If it is not eliminated properly, the levels of urea in the blood rise above normal (uremia) and this causes health problems that especially affect the liver - the organ responsible for processing proteins - and the kidneys (which must filter the final waste product), and that without treatment can become serious, and even cause the death of the patient.
