4. How does the punctuation of “A Narrow Fellow in the Grass” affect its meaning?

2 answers:

6 0

The person above me is wrong! He or she is wrong! Wrong! Here is the CORRECT ANSWER! I TURNED IT IN A GOT 100% PLEASE TRUST ME!

HERE IS THE CORRECT ANSWER!:

The dashes create pauses that slow the reader down. However, they don't stop the reader. They tell the reader that this idea isn't over, that it connects with the next line. The dash is a way of organizing ideas and slowing the pace of the poem while keeping everything connected. Capital letters are words that the reader is supposed to pay close attention to and say with force.

P.S. This is not copied! I repeat this is not copied! Search in on Grammarly Plagiarism! Not copied!

sergiy2304 [10]4 years ago

4 0

Here it refers to the insect or earthworm that moves through the green grass.

You might be interested in

The score of Sachin in consecutive five innings at 80, 90 ,100, 100 and M respectively. the average of the five inning is 100 ,

Jlenok [28]

Explanation:

The score of Sachin in consecutive five innings at 80, 90 ,100, 100 and M respectively.

The average of the five innings is 100.

We need to find the value of M.

Average = sum of observations/total no of observations

Sum of observations = 80+90+100+100+M

= 370 + M

Total no. of observations = 5

Put all the values,

$100=\dfrac{370+M}{5}\\\\500=370+M\\\\M=500-370\\\\M=130$

So, he scored 130 in his last innings.

He scored (130-80 = 50) more in his last innings as compared to the first inning scored.

7 0

3 years ago

Who is the first human in the world?

Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Adam (religiously)

or Lucy (scientifically; there wasn't really a first human, but if you had to come up with someone, this is what might be considered correct, as it is the earliest remains)

Explanation:

religiously [Judaism/Christianity], the first person is believed to be Adam, created by G*d.

scientifically (based on fossil records and theories of evolution), there was no first "human", or, at least, not in the way you're thinking of.

people, like all other organisms, have evolved from a very distant ancestor. This is called a common ancestor, and it is theorized to be shared by all organisms/life on earth [not the same as plants]. However, this ancestor is not even remotely human, it was likely no more than a worm-like creature.

Over time, different versions of this animal started evolving, and eventually, a species (which began to resemble humans as we see them now). Early Australopithecus would probably be the first "humans"--although, they were not really humans. These were in existence 1-5 million years ago. (This is when religion does not line up with science--we have fossil remains of Australopithecus, and they are not nearly what Adam is described as from a religious perspective, there is literally no possible way for a human to have been that evolved the same amount of time ago-

**This is why I believe that religious texts are theoretical, and were never written to be facts, they were stories that helped people understand morals. I am somewhat religious)

I digress. So, over time, these old distant versions of humans, that were really, really, different from humans evolved. This is why there is no first human, we evolved together.

One of the earliest recorded "humans" was Lucy, an Australopithecus. We don't believe her to be the first human scientifically, because there could be no first human--our existence is evolution, and there is no start to human history--it begins from a place that was not humans.

So, there was no first human, only the earliest recordings of one (which is what we often simplify to be the first human)

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the following selection from "A Retrieved Reformation" and answer the question that follows:

Andrei [34K]

The warden thinks Jimmy can turn his life around

8 0

3 years ago

What is loveness is anyone online

Sindrei [870]

Answer: