1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
4 years ago
8

How did the Jackson era change politics in America?

History
1 answer:
In-s [12.5K]4 years ago
6 0
The Jackson Era set the Executive Branch on an equal footing with Congress in terms of power and ability to shape law and government policies
You might be interested in
The process of how Englishmen were transformed into Americans
weeeeeb [17]

Answer:

se frona e suetdodasuidosn

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a reason that the League of Nations failed.
NeX [460]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)
soldi70 [24.7K]

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who had the chicken mcgriddles
saveliy_v [14]
Mcdonald’s

easy points here
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was not a way that Georgia O'Keeffe spent her time?
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

A) She served in the senate for one term

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The ancient olmecs of mesoamerica prized ________ for its translucence, which they associated with rainwater.
    9·2 answers
  • How many political parties were allowed in the Soviet Union
    5·1 answer
  • After black codes were established in the South, unemployed African-Americans
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following were changes in agriculture that helped speed up the process of industrialization?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did kennedy and guevara see this revolution differently
    9·1 answer
  • Explain Jackson's belief on federal government
    12·1 answer
  • What was one result of the industrialization in the United States during the mid 1800s?​
    6·1 answer
  • As they campaigned for support among Germans, how did the Nazi party propose to solve the problems that faced the German people
    7·1 answer
  • Whats 2+2? pls hurry
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following Enlightenment thinkers is correctly matched?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!