Try reading the book, I know that will have ALL of the answers you will need to be successful.
The concept of a good argument is of course quite vague, if
an argument has only one or more false premises, then it is not a good
argument. Unless the premises of an argument are all true, then it would have
no reason to accept to accept its conclusion. In my line of my work In Home Health
Care there is always a good argument to go on.
I believe the answer is B) more restrictions were placed on slaves
In <span>"Denmark Vesey plot" , a plot created by the slaves to overtake a city in one night was spoiled by a fellow slave that snitched their plan to his owner who reported it to local authorities.
After this incident, many of those slaves were hang and several restrictions were made in order to prevent their defiance.</span>
1)their education system is different from other countries
2)their languages differ according to territorial limits (meaning boundaries )
3)there are better social services compared to other countries
No, because the 3/5 comprimise says that slaves (for representation and tax purposes) were only 3/5 of a person. Today of course we know that blacks are a full person. However, at the time, it was useful and a good comprimise when the issue of slaves was split like it was in the country.
