Answer:
<u><em>Hi There the correct answer are A. Cuba</em></u>
Explanation:
<u>Why it Cuba let me tell you The Battle of San Juan Hill, also known as the battle for the San Juan Heights, was a decisive battle of the Spanish–American War. The San Juan heights was a north-south running elevation east of Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.</u>
The anti-imperialist argued that:
- <span>imperialism is immoral because we diminish other cultures and forcing them to follow ours.
- The process of annexation would cost a huge amount of money that would cripple our own economy.
- The mentality of defeat and conquer could affect how citizens think and imposed the same principle to other citizens of united states, which would create a division in the country,</span>
The correct answer is alternative C.
The United States Constitution expressly forbids the government to pass <em>ex post facto</em> laws, which are laws that can change the legal consequences of actions in the past. In some countries <em>ex post facto</em> laws are acceptable in some situations, but in the U.S. this is such an unacceptable thing that it seemed obvious and unnecessary to include in the Constitution.
Answer:
Mongkut, also called Phrachomklao, posthumous name Rama IV, (born Oct. 18, 1804, Bangkok—died Oct. 15, 1868, Bangkok), king of Siam (1851–68) who opened his country to Western influence and initiated reforms and modern development. Mongkut was the 43rd child of King Rama II, but as the first son to be born of a queen he was favoured to succeed to the throne
Explanation:
Answer:
The Anti Federalists needed 5 state votes to vote no, while the Federalists needed 9 states to vote yes, 9 of 13 had to approve. Northern states approved, Southern states were divided and were unhappy with the 3/5 comprise. Virginia and New York demanded a Bill of Rights before ratifying it.
Explanation:
The Anti-Federalists feared the national government would hold too much power and that citizens rights would be in danger. They felt the nation did not need a standing army and that the Constitution would not protect individual rights. They wanted a Bill of Rights.
