<u>Own sewage systems After the Public Health Act;</u>
The 1848 Public Health Act was the absolute first law on general wellbeing to be passed in the United Kingdom. It set up a Central Board of Health whose activity it was to improve sanitation and expectations for everyday comforts in towns and crowded territories in England and Wales.
Its motivation was to arrange past measures planned for fighting messy urban living conditions, which caused different wellbeing dangers, including the spread of numerous illnesses, for example, cholera and typhus.
In July 1842, the most significant nineteenth Century production on social change was discharged, titled, 'Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Laboring Population of Great Britain'.
This investigation into sanitation was the mind offspring of a legal counselor, Edwin Chadwick (1800-1890). It took such huge numbers of years for the administration to move different urban areas to make their own sewage frameworks.
B.georgia is the correct answer
With the influx of people to urban centers came the increasingly obvious problem of city layouts. The crowded streets which were, in some cases, the same paths as had been "naturally selected" by wandering cows in the past were barely passing for the streets of a quarter million commuters. In 1853, Napoleon III named Georges Haussmann "prefect of the Seine," and put him in charge of redeveloping Paris' woefully inadequate infrastructure (Kagan, The Western Heritage Vol. II, pp. 564-565). This was the first and biggest example of city planning to fulfill industrial needs that existed in Western Europe. Paris' narrow alleys and apparently random placement of intersections were transformed into wide streets and curving turnabouts that freed up congestion and aided in public transportation for the scientists and workers of the time. Man was no longer dependent on the natural layout of cities; form was beginning to follow function. Suburbs, for example, were springing up around major cities
Americas and Oceania were similar in the way that first they both could developed experienced agricultural practices. Second, they could have their own distinct architecture, art and some other cultural characteristics with any influence from the outside. Third, some external groups sustained their nomadic hunter.-gathering lifestyle. And finally, both of them faced dangers of overpopulation and exposed of diseases they had never been exposed to. They both were different just because they developed large sophisticated societies in isolation merely.
