1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blababa [14]
3 years ago
15

In Marbury v Madison, what did Marbury want?

History
2 answers:
alexgriva [62]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is most likely C

As far as I can remember that was the issue.
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C. In Marbury v. Madison, Marbury wanted to force Madison to give him his commission.

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

You might be interested in
The hank mccune show was the first to use what technology?.
Lynna [10]

Answer:

canned laughter machine

Explanation:

I think

7 0
2 years ago
Plz help I am timed
Andrew [12]

Answer:

A. Asia

Explanation:

jskdkfkfkgkgkgjcjfkfnfjciff

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is a controversial piece of supply-side economics?
SCORPION-xisa [38]
A controversial piece of supply-side economics is the <span>increased funding for the government. Supply-side economics is an economic theory in which states that economic growth will be possible in investing capital and letting products, services, and goods enter. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
One reason powerful nations rushed to grab colonies in the 1800s was the desire (1 point)for raw materials and natural resources
uysha [10]


One reason powerful nations rushed to grab colonies in the 1800s  was the desire for raw materials and natural resources.

By the 1800s, strong, centrally governed nations/states in Europe had emerged. The industrial revolution that began during this time  greatly enriched the European economies.

The industrial revolution created needs and desires that had to be met. The European nations, aided by their new economic and military strength,  resorted to seize foreign lands to exploit them for raw materials and resources to feed the mother industries back home.

 

3 0
3 years ago
Where in california did migrant workers find jobs?
AysviL [449]
Migrants workers found job in San Joaquin Valley in California. This valley in California had a good stable climate which was good for farming. And because of route 66, they were straightly lead there from dustbowl in order to look for jobs. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes part of the United States' role in the global economy?
    8·2 answers
  • How did people in the early Tehuacan Valley live? What did they have for food and how did they get it?
    6·2 answers
  • If you had been a native-born Japanese American in 1942, what do you think would have been your reaction to the internment order
    12·2 answers
  • Life in the Middle Colonies was<br> A. very busy<br> B. chaotic<br> C. expensive
    6·2 answers
  • (Please help ASAP first correct answer gets brainliest, five stars, and a thank you! Please someone answer correctly I'm spendin
    14·1 answer
  • Which two trends in the 1990's were changes implemented by U.S. Business?
    10·2 answers
  • What French philosophy means "Let the people do as they choose"?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about the 2018 election are accurate?
    12·1 answer
  • List the three branches of government created by the new Constitution.​
    14·2 answers
  • Please help me
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!