1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hichkok12 [17]
3 years ago
5

All of the following countries sided with England against Hitler EXCEPT FOR

History
2 answers:
slega [8]3 years ago
6 0
It has to be Austria and Hungary - by then they were two separate countries.  The other three were Allies and along with britain they occupied Germany in 1945.
Alex777 [14]3 years ago
3 0

Considering the countries that stood on the side of England against Hitler, who entered the political scene and headed the German leadership between the two world wars, the only country that could not do it is Austria Hungary. This empire as a defeated party ceased to exist in 1918 after the end of the First World War, when it was divided in Austria and Hungary.

The answer is: A)

You might be interested in
Which concept can be considered a policy of expansion?
anastassius [24]

Answer:

Manifest Destiny

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(PLEASE HELP QUICK!!)
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:/Explanation

The term "Green Revolution" otherwise referred to as the Agricultural revolution was an era of a global massive agricultural boom during the 1950s and 1960s. The boom was triggered mainly by the introduction of innovative agricultural technologies in farming. Agricultural production within this period was at its peak, technologies like high-yielding or hybrid seeds were planted; mechanized irrigation and application of fertilizer and pesticides were also adopted; technology-driven food production, processing and storage facilities, and infrastructures were also developed to aid and enhance global agricultural productivity. The green revolution era was of immense benefit to developing nations, especially in Africa, and other Third World nations.

Some of the intended outcomes of the Green Revolution include:

1. Food Security: Green Revolution aided the attainment of average global food security. Food was more readily available and accessible. The initiative was able to prevent massive death and diseases which could have resulted from starvation and malnutrition.

2. Environmental Impact: The employment of safe technological innovation in agricultural production helped to reduce greenhouse gases emission, and thus curb the effect of climate change and global warming.

Some of the unintended outcomes include:

1. Introduction of new diseases and increase in mortality rate: The application of highly concentrated fertilizers to increase agricultural production and the use of high acidic pesticides to control pests had a negative effect on human health, in that humans end up consuming these chemicals which are absorbed by the plants, and this resulted in the growth of cancer disease in humans, and consequently, increase in mortality rate. The Punjab case in India is a classical example of the negative effect of the green revolution.

2. Population Growth: One other unintended outcome of the green revolution was that it encouraged population growth with the belief that there will be enough food to feed the growing world population. This was the biggest concern of Malthusian Theory, which posits that increase food production encourages increase population and that if the population growth is not controlled it will get to a point where the quantity of food produced won't be enough to meet the dietary needs of the world population, and consequently, the world will be plunged in famine.

6 0
3 years ago
Describe affirmative gerrymandering and explain why it used?
kozerog [31]

Describe affirmative gerrymandering and explain why it is used. (2 points) It is used to create districts mostly made up of minority voters; the goal is to give these voters a better chance of electing someone who supports their interests.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was it important to transport natural resources to the east in 1850
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

becz

Explanation:

there was lack of resources in east that time

3 0
3 years ago
Who were the Loyalists? What elements in America remained loyal to the king, and for what reasons?
VikaD [51]
The Loyalists were the people who remained loyal to the British Crown rather than were in favour of independence.

The Loyalist were on the average older and partially also richer: they were better established and therefore a change would be a risk for them. This was their reason: they were afraid of change and of loosing their position.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The embargo act of 1807 did serious damage to the economies of england and france.
    6·2 answers
  • I haved been stuck on this one and I really need help?um idk
    8·2 answers
  • Two main physical educators who were early leaders in expanding the field of sport and distancing exercise philosophy from educa
    9·1 answer
  • Since Rosa Parks was not the first African American women arrested for bus violation,why did her arrest ignite the boycott?
    15·1 answer
  • Warm Up
    10·1 answer
  • On average, juveniles enjoyed lighter sentences during the 1980s and 1990s.
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following critics of the Mexican American War most directly influenced the philosophy of the 20th century civil rig
    10·1 answer
  • What type of interest group focuses on interests concerning a specific issue?
    12·2 answers
  • Panuto: Tukuyin ang Dinastiya sa China, Korea
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me Due 12:00 Pm please 6
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!