Answer:
In the 7th century, a change occurred in the deserts of Arabia that would end up changing the face of the world. From the deserts of Arabia, the Arabs would emerge and challenge perhaps the two greatest empires of their time. They would defeat these great empires in battle after battle. Nothing would be able to stop them. They would face their enemies outnumbered and outmatched, with a new faith within their hearts, and emerge victorious. From the victories would rise Arab empires that have since been unmatched, the Ummayads and Abbasids.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST PRESSING THE CROWN BUTTON ON MY ANSWER PLS
Early Greek philosopher Anixamander (ca. 610 – 545 BC) was a monist. That means he believed that ultimately there is just one sort of substance underlying all the different things we see in the physical universe. He put forth the idea that this single underlying substance of all things is something beyond our experience. He called it the ἄπειρον (<em>apeiron</em>), which means "the boundless" or "the limitless." Anaximander was reacting to the views of Thales, a previous thinker from his same town, Miletus, who had suggested that there was one underlying substance to all things, and that <u>water</u> was that essential element. Anaximander objected to Thales' thought, because water is something we all see and experience readily in the perceived world. He believed any underlying or base-level substance, from which water and any other physical stuff originated, had to be something beyond the boundaries of our present experience, or "the boundless."
One evaluation of Anaximander's views came from another Milesian philosopher who followed him: Anaximenes. Anaximenes saw the theory of Anaximander as dodging the question, "What is the main ingredient of all things in the universe." By saying, "It's boundless; it's something we don't know," had he really answered anything? So Anaximenes dismissed the view of Anaximander ... but didn't agree with Thales either. Anaximenes proposed that air was the underlying element of all physical phenomena.
You'll have to decide for yourself what you think of Anaximander's "boundless" theory.
Women had long been seen as stay at home mothers before World War Two and only that. The stereotypical, perfect American family had the father that brought home the bacon each day during the week and the mother who raised their children. The fact of the matter is, women always worked outside the house but it just wasn’t glorified as much. These women were usually in the lower class or the minority and many men did not have the best attitude toward them. A male could better suit their jobs, the men believed. During WWII all of this changed and a revolution in the work force was eventually seen. Numbers of women working outside the home rose exponentially and they thought they were there to stay. Women also played a large role in the military, which had never been seen before. Gender roles had changed in the modern world; women throughout the nation made a huge impact on the Second World War efforts.
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
The documents are similar in the following ways:
Both recognize the importance of preserving basic rights such as liberty.
Both seek to end oppression from monarchies.
Both acknowledge the public’s role in the smooth functioning of nation.
The documents differ in the following ways:
The Declaration of Independence sought independence from colonial rule, while the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen sought a new form of government.
The Declaration of Independence states that people have the right to pursue happiness, which isn’t mentioned in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen includes the rights of property and security, which aren’t included in the Declaration of Independence.
Explanation:
This is for how they are similar and different
