Yes, progress occurs when the people govern and the little clique that dominated the nation must disappear because they ruled to benefit themselves, not the country or its residents.
If people control a nation, good progress occurs in every sector, leading to the country's and its people's development.
This is further explained below.
<h3>Describe a development that was the product “of a widespread sense that the people should rule and that government by traditional elites had come to an end.”?</h3>
Generally, The reign of a small number of elites over a nation must come to an end in order for the nation to experience true progress. This is due to the fact that the small group of elites only governed for their own gain, and not for the good of the nation or its population.
In conclusion, If there is a rule of people in the nation, then good growth will occur in every sector, which will contribute to the development of both the people and the country.
Read more about development
brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ1
Answer:
Station troops inside member nations
Explanation:
The Warsaw Pact allowed for the Red Army to be based in member states. It also provided for a unified military command and a system of mutual assistance. It caused for the Soviet Union to launch a multinational invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.
Answer:
allies and friends of the west
Explanation:
I've tried my best
<span>
The policy of appeasement encouraged aggression because there were
no consequences for aggression. Each victory gave Hitler more
confidence. </span>
Answer: there are many forms of communism and fascism (!!!) Italian fascism is not the same as English or Romanian fascism. Differences exist especially in theory, ideology, doctrine. When we move to practice and regime as it works in reality, there are few differences (for example: Communism should be theoretically open to all people without discriminating race....in the USSR Jews were discriminated). So description of differences will be purely theoretical:
1) fascism is born around 1900 whereas Communism came into existence (as a theory) already in 1848 (Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx).
2) Communism has its central authority (Karl Marx)....all the rest is derived from his thought. Fascism lacks that....it is a nebulous plurality of authors, mixture of ideas.
3) Communism is product of Enlightenment (primacy of reason, idea of progress, just society etc.) whereas fascism is a produt of Anti-Enlightenment (irrationalism, primacy of ancestry or race, belief in the soul of nation, sometimes necessity of exceptional leading elite, frequently is linked with some almost religious faith, cult of body, physical strength, very patriarchal, references to Middle Ages).
Explanation: similarities....both were born in times where masses were entering politics and both needs masses. Both preach man of masses. They do not promote individuality, individuality is suppressed.
