1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
TiliK225 [7]
4 years ago
6

A major concern with Social Security is the possibility that funds will not be available when today’s tax-payers retire to becom

e beneficiaries. According to the Social Security Trustee’s report, an increase of 1.89% in the Social Security payroll tax would keep the account full for the next 75 years. To achieve similar results, benefits would have to be decreased from the current 42% of the ending salary to 29% of the salary.
Cindy is relatively new to the workforce. She has 32 years until she can retire. Her current annual salary is $45,000.

1a) Calculate how much Cindy will have to pay in Social Security tax (6.2%) based on this salary.
1b) Calculate how much Cindy will have to pay in Social Security tax if the tax was increased by 1.89%.

2a) Calculate Cindy’s annual Social Security benefit (about 42%) if her salary remains unchanged until she retires (annual average is $45,000).
2b) Calculate Cindy’s annual Social Security benefit if her salary remains unchanged but benefits (based on her annual salary of $45,000) were cut from 42% to 29%.

3) If Cindy were given a choice between the increase in Social Security tax now or the decrease in Social Security benefits when she retires, which would you recommend she choose? Explain your answer thoroughly.
Mathematics
2 answers:
amid [387]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1a) $45,000 * 0.062 = $2,790

1b) 6.2% + 1.89% = 8.09%;  $45,000 * 0.0809 = $3640.50

2a) $45,000 * 0.42 = $18,900

2b) 42% - 13% = 29% $45,000 * 0.029 = $13,050

3) You should probably recommend she pay the extra taxes now. If the tax were increased by 1.89%. Cindy would have to pay an extra $3640.50 - $2,790 = $850.50 per year for the 32 years before she retires. This adds up to $27,216 over the length of 32 years. On the other hand, if benefits were decreased from 42% of her salary to 29% of her salary the time of Cindy’s retirement (approximations), she would receive $18,900 - $13,050 = $5,850 less per year after she retires. This adds up to $58,500 in just 10 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the answer they have given me.

defon4 years ago
5 0
1a) 45,000 * 6.2% = 2,790
1b) 45,000 * (6.2% + 1.89%) = 45,000 * 8.09% = 3,640.50

2a) 45,000 * 42% = 18,900
2b) 45,000 * 29% = 13,050

3) I think it would be better to have an increase in Social Security tax now and receive 18,900 as annual pension rather than the decrease in Social Security benefits when she retires.
You might be interested in
I need help….. please help me
balu736 [363]
I can’t see that type it in word
8 0
3 years ago
Find the measure of the missing angles in the kite​
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

x = y = 104°

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the interior angles = 360°

The opposite angles x and y are congruent , that is y = x , then

92 + 60 + x + x = 360

152 + 2x = 360 ( subtract 152 from both sides )

2x = 208 ( divide both sides by 2 )

x = 104

Then

x = y = 104°

7 0
3 years ago
A loan on an investment property closed on July 1st for $765,000 at 5.5% interest amortized over 25 years at $4,697.77 per month
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

$763,808.48

Step-by-step explanation:

765,000 - (4,697.77 - (765,000 * .055/12)) =

$763,808.48

7 0
3 years ago
(20,-3) (19,-20) formula is: y2-y1/x2-x1
Orlov [11]

Answer:

17

Step-by-step explanation:

The first thing to do is plug in the numbers for the equation. Starting with:

[-20-(-3)]/(19-20)

When you answer that you simplify the answer to

(-20+3)/(19-20)

You answer what is in the parenthesis first.

(-17)/(-1)

After this step you simplify.

17.

The answer is seventeen because any number over 1 is just the number. For example, 3/1=3. The answer is positive because the negative in the numerator and denominator cancel eachother out. leaving the answer as 17.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the start of a hike, a hiker was at an elevation of -50 feet (where 0 represents sea level). The hiker climbs at a rate of 15
OLga [1]

Answer:

  • 15t - 50 > 5

Step-by-step explanation:

  • Initial point = -50 ft
  • Climbing rate = 15 ft / min
  • Time = t

<u>Required inequality:</u>

  • 15t - 50 > 5

<u>Solution:</u>

  • 15t > 55
  • t > 55/15
  • t > 3 10/15 = 3 40/60 min = 3 min 40 seconds
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the range and mean for this set of data? 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15 A. Range 5 Mean 5 B. Range 17 Mean 5 C. Range 1
    6·1 answer
  • Which is an equation of a line that has a slope of 6 and a y-intercept of (0, 12)?
    7·1 answer
  • How do you convert a radical expression to a rational exponent and vice versa?
    11·1 answer
  • A theater earned $87,890 in ticket sales. If each ticket cost $55, how many tickets were sold?
    8·2 answers
  • A disk with a radius of R is oriented with its normal unit vector at an angle ? with respect to a uniform electric field. Which
    13·1 answer
  • Unidad de Medida en el Sistema Internacional de 100 kilómetros.
    7·1 answer
  • I am having trouble with this question: 2/3 (3x−6)= 3/4 (2x+8)<br><br>find x
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE help me I beg you
    13·1 answer
  • Twice a number increased by the product of the number and fourteen results in forty eight
    8·1 answer
  • PLSSS HELP IF YOU TURLY KNOW THISS (exponents of zero)
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!