Sorry... didn't understand your question
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
I think it is A also because I am taking the same test in USA Test Prep.
Answer: in-groups and out-groups
Explanation: In-group is a group where two or more individuals who interact with themselves, share the same traits and to which an individual has a feeling of being united, in membership, belonging and close similarities.
Out-group is, therefore, a social group whereby the person doesn't have a feeling of being united, in membership, belonging and close similarities. However, there is always a certainty that individuals will tend to choose and have a natural liking and understanding for their in-group over the out-group.
