Answer: Gambler's fallacy
Explanations: Gambler's fallacy can be simply defined as a phenomenon where the outcome of an event is viewed as less or more likely due to the outcome of previous events even though each event is independent.
For example, If a family should give birth to (5) five boys, gambler's fallacy will argue that the chance or probability of the family giving birth to girl next higher because the previous ones were boys, but in reality the chances are thesame because both gender has equally chance of being conceived.
So Miranda’s statement is a good example of gambler's fallacy because she argue that the probability that she will toss a tail in her sixth toss is higher than 50% and in reality, the probability of tossing a head or a tail are both thesame i.e 50%.
The scientific method that emphasizes the method of attaining knowledge is by formulating hypothesis. With this method, in enables a person to come up with questions, making intelligent guess base on their learnings and experiences before they try to find it out and experiment it on, it is a way of attaining knowledge as a person tries to formulate this questions, he or she will likely use his or her knowledge and to be able to learn more in order to know more about the things that he or she would like to know and discover.
Answer:
Civil rights are an essential component of democracy. They're guarantees of equal social opportunities and protection under the law, regardless of race, religion, or other characteristics. Examples are the rights to vote, to a fair trial, to government services, and to a public education.
According to "To Kill a Mockingbird," the answer
is found on page 144, at the end of chapter 13, Scout asks Dill why Boo has
never run away. Dill answers and says to her that maybe he has nowhere to go, nobody
to run away to. Who would receive him and also, he doesn't even come out of the
house to start with.
Answer:
Accidental reinforcement
Explanation:
Accidental reinforcement occurs when a reinforcer casually concurs with a positive outcome, so the person associate the outcome with the reinforcer. This type of reinforcement is usually the source of superstitious behaviours.
In this case, Roger associated the fact of wearing green underwear to the good grade he got in his test, the green underwear was the reinforcer that casually concurs with the positive outcome which in this case was the good grade, so Roger started associating both and now he wears green underwear on test days.
