China was itself an established empire and could not be conquered the same way as they did Africa and India.
What you are saying is basically equal to saying why not land in England (during that period) and turn everyone into slaves.
Since that is impossible, establishing spheres of influence allows major powers to break China from the inside.
The major powers of europe, Japan, and America ganging up on china during those days is the main reason behind China's firm foreign policy today.
Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
Compared to the rest of American history, recent congresses have been less polarized and more productive in terms of passing laws.
<h3>What is congress?</h3>
Congress is a group meeting usually held by a number of individual or people.
The meeting is formal and usually involved delegate form different parties or group.
Congress are more productive as to passing and endorsing bills.
Therefore, compared to the rest of American history, recent congresses have been less polarized and more productive in terms of passing laws.
Learn more on congress below
brainly.com/question/491441
#SPJ1
