The one way that both truman and Stalin's approaches to maintaining peace were similar was :
Both support countries whose government or economic system were similar to their own.Truman keeps giving support to the countries with liberal views while Stalin gave that support to the countries with communist views.
Explanation:
During the cold war, both leaders abstained from any physical or formal acts of warfare. It mostly consisted of them getting control of foreign nations that were battling each other, but neither the US or Soviet Union announced war on one another. This was because it appeared so soon after WWII that neither wanted to be held accountable for another war. Nevertheless, they both were feuding, so they implemented to other non-violent means to battle with each other- such as spying, double-agents, surveillance, etc.
It shapes the political debate around abolition of drugs in general.
Answer:
Migrants eventually induce social, economic, and political problems in receiving countries, including
1) increases in the population, with adverse effects on existing social institutions;
2) increases in demand for goods and services;
3) displacement of nationals from occupations in the countryside and in the cities;
4) increases in the size of the informal sector of the national economy;
5) deterioration in the salary structures of the informal, rural, and urban sectors of the economy;
6) transculturation;
7) occasional loss of customs and traditions by the local population; and
8) the introduction of diseases and social problems. The receiving countries do benefit from the infusion of skills.
Answer:
- tendency rates tripled , 1880-1890
- cotton was deflated , market was flooded
- whole time they planted they put the prices down
- Union blockaded the South so they couldn't get cotton
- England found a new place to get cotton for cheaper ( India ,Egypt and Brazil)
- the US had too much cotton it began to build up
hope it helps :)
