1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zvonat [6]
4 years ago
15

Why was galen wrong in many of his statements about the human body even though he was a careful observer?

Social Studies
1 answer:
alina1380 [7]4 years ago
7 0

It is because Galen based his information about anatomy on what he had found out during dissecting the bodies of animals. This created mistakes on his claims in human anatomy. Some of these anatomical errors were the following:

1.       He thought muscles are attached to the bone just like in dogs.

2.       He thought that the liver produces blood. He then realized that it flowed around the body, but he claimed that is burned fuel for the muscle.

3.       He thought that there are holes through the septum, which allowed the blood to flow from one side to another of the heart.

4.       He thought that there are blood vessels in the brain.

5.       He thought human’s jaw was made up of two bones just like a dog’s.

6.       He made mistakes about the liver’s shape.

You might be interested in
Em Platão a Ética tem uma ligação direta com sua filosofia política e com sua teoria do conhecimento. Assim como na república pl
Andreas93 [3]
Para entendê-lo, não devemos desejar nada e então encontraremos a resposta?
3 0
3 years ago
Was reconstruction a success? <br><br> Please help
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
Though, like all things in life, it did come to an end, the resulting outcome has been labeled both a success and a failure. When Reconstruction began in 1865, a broken America had just finished fighting the Civil War. So yes, reconstruction was a success.
5 0
3 years ago
Michael believes that he will be able to improve his public speaking skills after completing a speech course at school. Based on
Finger [1]

Answer:

self-efficacy.              

Explanation:

Self-efficacy: The term self-efficacy is given by the psychologist Albert Bandura. He explains the term as an individual's belief in his or her capabilities to triumph in accomplishing a task or a particular situation.

According to Bandura, an individual's sense of self-efficacy plays an important role in the way he or she approaches particular tasks, goals, and challenges. In other words, it reflects the trust in oneself to lead to a specific behavior, and motivation. Self-efficacy is the foundation of leadership.

Based on the social-cognitive theory, one might observe that Michael is not lacking in self-efficacy.

6 0
3 years ago
Someone, Please help!!!
Margarita [4]

<em>In</em><em> </em><em>my</em><em> </em><em>knowledge</em><em> </em>

<em>up</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>0</em><em> </em><em>gallons</em><em> </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>time</em><em> </em><em>This water is stored in the animal's bloodstream</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Based on the foundations of federalism, why might health care continue to be a deeply debated issue? The debate is over whether
Yanka [14]

Health care has always been a highly debated issue for several reasons. The first one is whether it should be controlled by each state or the federal government and the solution to the debate could be that every state were able to control their local health care programs but with a federal agency to supervise it. This takes us to the next issue; Politicians argue that no single healthcare program will cover all Americans. And they have a valid point, but if every state could create and control their local health care programs, it would be easier to reach a wider number of citizens with a health care program. The next issue of the debate is whether those programs should affect tax rates, and of course they would, but only at a local level, not at the federal level. The last point of the debate is that the medical professionals are opposed to such programs. Of course they are against it, nowadays medical attention costs a fortune, and doctors receive great sums of money for their services. There should be a balance in the cost health care, I am not suggesting that it should be free for everybody, only to the most needed ones.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How can the use of new technology in industry benefit producers
    7·2 answers
  • Who was the first president of the U.s during the "greaf depression"
    13·1 answer
  • In Hellenistic kingdoms, government business was conducted in what language
    15·1 answer
  • Who painted the image above?
    14·2 answers
  • Black Codes were the first form of segregation laws after the Civil War.
    13·1 answer
  • What kind of problems may occur in the absence of empathy and cooperation? Plz help ASAF
    11·1 answer
  • Específica cada una de las causas qué fecundaron la revolución Francesa y responde cuál de los cuatro crees que detonó este suce
    5·1 answer
  • How does stock security help for the financial management of a country or company?​
    8·1 answer
  • write an essay evaluating the indian removal act and its effect on americas deveolpment as a nation did it help grow the nation
    8·1 answer
  • When the task of correctly identifying an individual in a slide of a four-person lineup was both difficult and important , parti
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!