Answer:
online classes:We can't chit chat with our friends and it is so boring seeing and seeing the device
Al school:We can chit chat, talk, laugh with our friends
Answer:
Technology has done more harm than good to humanity
Explanation:
On this topic, everyone is actually entitle to his/her own opinion but as for me, I'm opposing the motion. Basically, I'm not opposing this topic because I'm in science field/department but just that I have more facts to prove that science has really helped our generation.
In my neighborhood, state and country, this has been a controversial issue by many. I have heard many detest the way technology is shaping our world. Many said the way the world was before, is better than now. Adding that it's we human, that we're shortening our lives with so called technology advancement.
Hearing all these most times, always make me feel some how and think that, are scientist to be blamed or credited for the world advancement? Or is there a crime inventing more technologies? I'm just always curious and wondering why some people are not buying this idea of technology advancement.
Some years back, I was in a university being among students having a debate on this particular topic. Some were supporting, while some were opposing. That day, it was a tug of war. I could remember the lecturer coordinating the debate was speechless. She didn't know or figure out who to be called a winner or a loser. She saw the anger each speaker on opposing or supporting are pouring out on the topic.
The debate ended without any winner or loser. Then, I asked myself; is this a mutual facts on supporting or opposing this topic? because i could see the lecturer too didn't point out any winner. But later on, in my findings, researching and observations, I could see science has really done more good than harm and not the vice versa. I added observation because there are some things in our vicinities that we don't need to research about but merely looking at those/that thing(s) you will observe this is/are the work(s) of Science and Technology.
Answer: A)To show that early in her career she supported equal rights for
everyone
Explanation:
- In the section ''An Outspoken Politician'' there is a description of Shirley Chisholm's life after teaching career. She decided to run for the NY State Assembly in the 1960s and in 1964 she was elected to the assembly. People were fighting for equal rights back then and she was the first black woman who served in US congress so therefore we can see that the author intended to show that she fought for equality.
She supported education, poor students and female teacher which she did successfully.
Answer:
Evidence
It is a conclusion drawn from subtext.
Is there an attachment to this?