Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Total material variance = Actual quantity × Actual rate - Standard quantity × Standard rate
= 29000 × $6.3 - (16,000 units × 2) × $6
= $182,700 - $192,000
= - $9,300 favorable
Material price variance = Actual quantity × Actual price - Actual quantity × Standard price
= (29,000 units × $6.3) - (29,000 units × $6)
= $182,700 - $174,000
= $8,700 unfavorable
Material quantity variance = Standard quantity × Actual quantity - Standard rate × Standard quantity
= $6 × 29,000 units - $6 × (16,000 units × 2)
= $174,000 - $192,000
= -$18,000 favorable
The favorable is when the standard cost is more than the actual one while the unfavorable is when the standard cost is less than the actual one
Answer:
If a company must expand capacity to accept a special order, it is likely that there will be an increase in fixed costs.
Explanation:
The fixed costs are the part of the total costs of production that remain constant during a given reference quantity in a certain period. These include, for example, depreciation of fixed assets or rental or interest expenses. Since fixed costs are incurred regardless of the application quantity (short-term), they cannot be apportioned to the unit costs according to the cause.
In the present case, given that the company must expand its capacity to take the special order, it means that all of its production factors are totally devoted to production, so that in order to produce a greater quantity of goods, the productive factors must be increased, which are part of the fixed production costs that the company has. Therefore, as the costs of production are altered, there will be an increase in fixed costs.
Answer:
Correll Company
a. Yes State R residents who purchased Firm L (out-of-state) merchandise owe use tax on their purchases.
b. State R would collect $1,080,000 additional revenue ($18 million * 6%) if Correll was required to collect the use tax at the point of sale and then remit the tax collected to State R.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Cost of merchandise to customers in State R = $18 million
State R's sales and use tax on the purchase and consumption of retail goods within the state = 6%
Amount that Correll could collect for State R = $1,080,000 ($18 million * 6%)
b) Note that Correll (Firm L) collecting the State R use tax does not affect State R residents' legal liability to pay the use tax. Unfortunately, not many people actually remit their self-assessed use tax.
