1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenaWriter [7]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following was part of the fugitive slave act passed in 1856

History
1 answer:
kobusy [5.1K]3 years ago
7 0
Do you have any choices?
You might be interested in
What is the purpose of having a formal amendment process?
maw [93]
To permanently protect the people of the nation from unreasonable amendment proposals and ratifications
4 0
3 years ago
How was the economic situation in the United States different than in European nations in the 1920s?
Irina18 [472]
The economy in the United States in the 1920's varied greatly from European countries. After WWl, Europe struggled to rebuild. Europe had taken the brunt of the attacks and went into a deep depression. The United States in contrast boomed. The economy was better than ever before. Since no attacks had happened on American soil, we were able to mass produce consumer goods, etc. People were buying on credit, investing in the stock market, and moving to the city. Life was good in America; not so good in Europe.
7 0
3 years ago
why is it in the presidents best interest to nominate several federal judges favored be most senators?
slamgirl [31]
During the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia established equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives.  Called the “Great Compromise” or the “Connecticut Compromise,” the unique plan for congressional representation resolved the most controversial aspect of the drafting of the Constitution.  

In the weeks before the Constitution’s framers agreed to the compromise, the delegates from the states with large populations argued that each state’s representation in the Senate should correspond to the size of the state.  Large-state delegates promoted James Madison’s Virginia Plan, the document that was the basis for several of the clauses in the Constitution.  Under this plan, the Senate and the House would base their membership on the same proportional “right of suffrage.”   That is, the number of senators in each state would be determined by its population of free citizens and slaves.  Large states, then, stood to gain the most seats in the Senate.  As justification for this advantage, delegates noted that their states contributed more of the nation’s  financial and defensive resources than small states, and therefore, required a greater say in government.

Small-state delegates hoped to protect states’ rights within a confederate system of government. Fearing the effects of majority rule, they demanded equal representation in Congress, as was practiced under the Articles of Confederation and assumed in William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan.  In fact, some framers threatened to withdraw from the convention if a proportional representation measure passed.  

Other delegates sought a compromise between large-state and small-state interests.  As early as 1776, Connecticut’s Roger Sherman had suggested that Congress represent the people as well as the states.  During the 1787 convention, Sherman proposed that House representation be based on the population, while in the Senate, the states would be equally represented.  Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate except in matters concerning money.  The convention’s grand committee reported his motion, with some modifications, to the delegates early in July.  Madison led the debates against Franklin’s measure, believing it an injustice to the majority of Americans, while some small-state delegates were reluctant even to support proportional representation in the House.  On July 16, delegates narrowly adopted the mixed representation plan giving states equal votes in the Senate within a federal system of government.

Once delegates established equal representation in the Senate, they needed to determine how many senators would represent each state.  State constitutions offered some guidance.  Several states designated one senator per county or district, while in Delaware there were three senators for each of the three counties.  Convention delegates did not refer to the state precedents in debate, however.  Instead, they seemed to take a common-sense approach in deciding the number of senators.

According to constitutional commentator Joseph Story (1779-1845), few, if any, delegates considered one senator per state sufficient representation.   Lone senators might leave their state unrepresented in times of illness or absence, and would have no colleague to consult with on state issues.  Additional senators, moreover, would increase the size of the Senate, making it a more knowledgeable body, and better able to counter the influence of the House.   On the other hand, a very large Senate would soon lose its distinctive membership and purpose, and actually decrease its ability to check the lower house or to allow senators to take personal responsibility for their actions.

Given these considerations, delegates had a limited choice regarding the number of senators.  During the convention, they briefly discussed the advantages of two seats versus three.   Gouverneur Morris stated that three senators per state were necessary to form an acceptable quorum, while other delegates thought a third senator would be too costly.  On July 23, delegates filled in the blank in the proposal offered by Morris and Rufus King: “That the representation in the second branch consist of _____ members from each State, who shall vote per capita.” Only Pennsylvania  voted in favor of three senators.  When the question turned to two, Maryland alone voted against the measure, not because of the number, but because Martin disagreed with per capita voting, which gave each senator, rather than each state, one vote.

6 0
3 years ago
The Fifth Amendment gives an accused person _____________.
Helga [31]
The answer would be the right to remain silent. hope that helped
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What lead to the development of slave codes?
harina [27]
After the revolutionary war, most states, especially those in the south, developed new slave codes. after the 1830s these laws became increasingly stringent, due to the tensions produced by the Nat Turner Rebellion in southampton county, VA., and the rise of the abolitionist movement in the north. hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A colony run by a governor who was directly responsible to the crown was called
    8·1 answer
  • What was the first blueprint of the u s government?
    11·1 answer
  • Some Native Americans easily converted to Catholicism.
    6·1 answer
  • He was the spanish explorer who conquered the aztec empire in the 1520s. He is _______
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following groups was one part of the New Deal coalition?
    5·1 answer
  • Which one was a colonial reaction to England's tax on the cheaper tea? A, Boston Massacre B. Boston Tea Party Please help!!
    11·2 answers
  • What are some common characteristics of creation stories
    6·1 answer
  • Please, some one help me with this. I filled some out for yall but im confused about the rest. Please no inappropriate content!
    6·1 answer
  • The united states helped overthrow guatemalan president guzman in the early 1950s because he was suspected of being a communist
    11·1 answer
  • 9
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!