1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shkiper50 [21]
4 years ago
15

How would early tribes have learned about other people

History
2 answers:
Alexus [3.1K]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B: through migratory patterns

Explanation:

Although we can't discard completely the other three options, it is most likely that the early tribes learned about other people trough migratory patterns. Many tribes were nomadic people who primarily were hunters-gatherers. Therefore they would have known about each other observing their migratory patterns. Because archeologists have found remnants in different areas, it is believed that the different bands communicated, perhaps even trading among each other.

Reika [66]4 years ago
4 0
I’d say b I hope that helps
You might be interested in
Why was the president to blame for that attack on Pearl Harbor?
Virty [35]

Answer:

Franklin D. Roosevelt provoked the Japanese military to attack the U.S. naval base which cause an uproar

Explanation:

you didnt provide answer options. Hope its correct.

8 0
3 years ago
Urooj are you here please ltell​
Nadusha1986 [10]
Who is that? Is this even a question?
3 0
3 years ago
Between 1885-1914, almost all of Africa was divided between Belgium, France, Great Britain, Germany, Spain, Italy and Portugal.
Firlakuza [10]
I think A .Great Britan and France in not all the way sure
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would you rather be a patriot or loyalist? Can you have reasoning as to why you either chose patriot or loyalist?
Delvig [45]

Answer:

loyalist?

Explanation:

because as a loyilst im loyal :)

8 0
3 years ago
How did britain and france emerge from wwi as both victors and losers
Romashka [77]

Great Britain and France were both winners and losers of the World War I. These two nations were winners because at the end they were on the side that won the war. Because of that they were also able to constrain their main enemy, and managed to have some benefits. But they were also losers in the war. This was because both of them had lot of damage in their infrastructure especially France. Both lost of lot soldiers which weakened them in a military sense, and both had huge economic losses and very fragile economies afterward. That eventually led to gradual loss of their power over their colonies, and after the World War II they lost them as they were where not able to control them anymore after the damage they had at home.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did rice become a Chinese staple food during the Tang dynasty?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Enlightenment and the Great Awakening influence slavery?
    9·1 answer
  • 22. Adolf Hitler's aims included
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Harding administration respond to growing public fears of communists and anarchists? A )by using propaganda to convi
    7·1 answer
  • In which period of American history would you have been MOST likely to find the greatest number of farmers ? A)1920s B)1940s C)1
    15·1 answer
  • 3. A bill has been sent to you by Congress that involves making flag burning
    10·1 answer
  • From the article Women in Ancient Christianity - The New
    13·1 answer
  • ANSWER THIS FAST PLEASE)
    9·1 answer
  • 3. Why did the debate about the U.S. role in the world in 1919-1920 focus on the questions of
    6·2 answers
  • The us constitution establishes federalism, affect?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!