Answer:
C) The invention of the printing press and improvements in literacy
Explanation:
ohannes Gutenberg invented the printing press in the 1430s. Until that moment, all the literary and printing were made manually. The spread of reading and knowledge across Europe turns into something speed and practical. When it comes to Protestant Reformation, the printing press became <u>a useful tool to disseminate the new values, but especially to offer a considerable number of people, an easy reading content. </u>Another important point about these new values was<u> the need to offer the Bible in the common language.</u> Since the rise of Christianity in the third century, the Bible and the cult celebrations were made in Latin, turning the understanding and the access very hard to a common population. <u>From that moment, all the material would be printed to be easily understandable.</u>
The reason countries promote trade is to have better economies and in turn to have more money to have a better quality of life in the country.
Explanation:
In the modern world of free trade and the globalization of all commodities it is important for nations to be prosperous to exert power on the world stage and to have a better lifestyle compared to the other parts of the world.
To make sure this happens the countries must have capital superiority, which can only be achieved by the flow of money in their economy.
This flow of money only happens when there is trade. The more trade happens inside the country and the inter country market the more the value of the money being traded.
Answer:
About 500 million people worldwide contracted the flu, and 50 million people died. More American soldiers died from the flu than from combat in World War I. By 1918, the Central Powers began to collapse. On 9 November, 1918, the German monarchy was overthrown.
Explanation:
Answer:
George Washington's forays into the Ohio country shaped his career and sparked a global war.
Explanation:
Answer:
Why shouldn't we judge historical figures by the standards of our time?
Many of the vices we might rightfully judge a historical society or individual for are largely universal across culture and society.
We should judge them accordingly and learn from their mistakes, but we should also judge them by the degree to which that person or culture rejected those common vices and built something better. This is something quite rare and it’s far more useful as a learning tool for us to focus on this.
For example, the Greeks and Romans practiced slaveryBut so did every other ancient society. What is unique and admirable about the Greeks and Romans is the degree to which they did respect indvidual rights, seriously questioned slavery as an institution, and developed a secular, pro reason culture
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest