1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio [31]
3 years ago
12

Who had more power in medieval Europe: popes or kings. Why?

History
1 answer:
Goryan [66]3 years ago
6 0
The Pope was given the victory and the power at the time, however, it was short lived and eventually was one of the reasons that led to the future collapse of the Middle Ages.Why? Because he was able to decide what the church would teach and more importantly during this time he was able to determine who was an enemy of the church. If the Pope deemed someone as a foe of the church, he was able to Excommunicate those who opposed his teachings. With these changes, the Pope was able to gain a vast amount of political power as well as fame and fortune, due to his followers, and ultimately challenge the King for supreme power throughout the land. Something like that
You might be interested in
In which city were the 1980 winter olympics held
snow_lady [41]
The 1980 winter Olympics were held at Lake Placid
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the sepoy of India
gogolik [260]

A sepoy was the name given to an Indian infantryman employed hired by the British East India Company.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct locations on the image.
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

I would go with the two region's along the river: Lower Egypt & Thebes

Explanation:

Ancient Egyptians were highly dependent on agriculture so they'd need fresh water. That means those two locations would be suitable for them because they were along the river.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would you characterize american politics in the early 1840's?
just olya [345]
A ss holes becases they didint support there presitent

7 0
2 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST. Could commoners in Hinduism become warriors and move up in the caste system? Or would it just be the elite
harina [27]

<u>Commoners in Hinduism as warriors:</u>

The commoners in Hinduism can become warriors and this does not make them to move up in the caste system.  

Neither of the given statements fits to warriors. Anyone can become a warrior and this is not based on the caste system. In Hinduism, the people are grouped according to their habitation.

They had a clear cut vision in grouping that one who imparts knowledge is Brahmins, one who fights and protects people from enemies are Kshatriyas, one who does business is vaishyas and finally one who does the hard labor is shudras.

The warrior from any one of the groups will always remain in the same cult there won’t get upgraded or downgraded in the caste system which is derived according to the habitation. In this grouping, there is no discrimination every individual will practice their system of life.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Which of the following was NOT a reason slavery began in South Carolina? (1 point)
    13·1 answer
  • How did a more advanced knowledge of monsoon winds help stimulate trade from Africa to Asia
    6·1 answer
  • Which group of people immediately
    15·1 answer
  • Which political faction was most radical?
    13·1 answer
  • The four viceroyalties of Latin America were:
    15·1 answer
  • Did Smith think that increased global contact was generally a good thing or a bad thing? How does he make his opinion on this cl
    5·1 answer
  • What events led to the succession of the southern states
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement accurately describes the U.S. Supreme Court?
    11·2 answers
  • Inside which command group will a user find the ability to configure Outlook rules used to organize a mailbox?
    6·2 answers
  • Which was one of the effects of European colonization on Native Americans?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!