In conclusion, I would recommend not passing any extra questions (so the reader can have a sense of closure). Also, I think the sentence “it is helpful if you already speak a foreign language.” Should be removed because it puts a limitation on the reader and makes them feel like they have an intimidating obligation. I would suggest something along the lines of:
Volunteering overseas is a unique and positive way to explore the world. The cost is often reasonable and the benefits obtained far outweigh the negatives. One can travel to magnificent new places and be able to make a difference where it is really needed. It cannot be recommended enough to engage in there wonderful opportunities as they are truly life-changing in their impact.
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
Answer:
The lengths of droughts have increased
Explanation:
Answer:
Symbolic interactionists study the ways in which people practice their faith and interact in houses of worship and other religious settings, and they study how and why religious faith and practice have positive consequences for individual psychological and physical well-being.
Explanation:
