Answer: This concept can be used to determine the acceptable level of risk, by placing the amount of risk in a given situation to balance against time, trouble, cost, and physical difficulty of taking precautions to avoid risk. If a balance is seen with risk against this variables, then the risk is acceptable.
The pitfall to applying this concept are as follows;
• it doesn't guarantee safety.
• it is always expensive, if we want to apply this principle to it best.
• it doesn't have a standard order for all kinds of risk. The application varies from risk to risk, also depending on locations of the risk.
Explanation: The ALARP principle is that risk shall be reduced as far as reasonably practicable. This means that zero risk can not be achieved. But we can achieve zero accident, using the ALARP principle.
Before we can boast for achieving ALARP, we must check if the risk is equal or less than time spent,cost, the trouble or challenge, and the physical difficulty of taking a good measure to avoid the risk. If the risk is equal or less than this variables, that means that the risk has been reduced as far as reasonably practicable.
Answer:
B) joining the League of Nations
Explanation:
- The Washington advice was that the country should try to avoid the permanent alliance with the foreign nations as during the times of the extreme dangers may be necessary. And asserted that the current treaties should be honored but not extended.
What do you mean? re-word it for me and ill answer your question.
Answer:
Freedom of expression is a core value in the democratic process. It ensures people are able to discuss, exchange, and debate ideas. Through the media and through public debate on and offline. Freedom of expression supports the development of informed citizens and voters.
So without freedom of speech we wouldn't have a say in what happens in today society.
Explanation:
