Answer:
A. polygenic inheritance
Explanation:
The type of non-Mendelian inheritance exemplified in human eye color is polygenic inheritance. In polygenic inheritance, a single trait is determined by the additive effect of more than one gene. Several gene combine together to determine a trait. Such traits are not definite, they are usually within a range spectrum, examples are height, hair color and eye color. Eye color is reported by researchers to be controlled by up to 10 genes
On the contrary monogenic inheritance are responsible for traits which are controlled by a single gene such as the ability to roll the tongue
Socialization
The process that teaches norms, values, and other aspects of culture to society's members is known as:
Answer:
Extinction
Explanation:
Extinction, in psychology, actually refers to the gradual weakening of a conditioned response that results in the decrease or disappearance of behavior completely, which is the case here. In other words, it is how the conditioned behavior eventually stops.
The available options are:
A. Repeating the false suggestion several times
B. Electrical shock
C. using a plausible false event
D. Asking the individual to imagine the event.
Answer:
Electric Shock
Explanation:
Option A not correct, because it is LIKELY to be effective in planting the false memories, because repeating the false memory over time, will make it easier for the person involved to retain the false memory.
Option C is not correct, because, using plausible false event for the person involved will make it easier to retain the false memory.
Option D is not correct, because letting the person involved to imagine the false event will make him or her to retain the false memories.
Option B is correct, because, using Electrical Shock, will only make the person involved to retain the memory of electrical shock but not the false memories that need to be planted.
Hence, the right answer is ELECTRIC SHOCK
In the presently stated speech, Laura would be arguing from the point of causation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When arguing from the point of causation, the speaker or presenter would base her arguments and claims concerning evidence which proves that certain events almost always bring about the same results, or likewise, certain events would always almost eradicate the effects of the events.
Hence here, Laura is speaking from the point of causation.
