1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gre4nikov [31]
3 years ago
12

How did government policies in Darfur contribute to the genocide there?The Sudan government sponsored concentration camps in Dar

fur.The Sudan government sponsored deportations of non-Arabs in Darfur.The Sudan government sponsored the destruction of farms in Darfur.The Sudan government sponsored the killing of non-Arabs in Darfur.
History
2 answers:
vesna_86 [32]3 years ago
6 0
The Sudan government sponsored the killing of non-Arabs in Darfur.<span>Came from my quiz

</span>
nydimaria [60]3 years ago
4 0

The Sudan government sponsored the destruction of farms in Darfur

AND

The Sudan government sponsored the killing of non-Arabs in Darfur.



Civil war began in the Darfur region in 2003, between the black African farming population and the nomadic Arab population. The Sudanese government gave its support to the Janjaweed, an Arab militia movement, that destroyed hundreds of villages and farms and murdered thousands of people. The International Criminal Court (as well as a number of nations themselves) have declared these actions in Darfur as genocide.


According to the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust, which gives attention not only to the Holocaust but to other instances of genocide, the ethnic cleansing campaign in Darfur has been responsible for the deaths of over 200,000 civilians, and over 2 million people have been displaced due to the violence.


You might be interested in
Who won the marathon
Zigmanuir [339]

The New York City Marathon is an annual marathon that courses through the five boroughs of New York City. It is the largest marathon in the world, with 52,812 finishers in 2018 and 98,247 applicants for the 2017 race.

8 0
3 years ago
Consider the following sequence of events: Congress passes a bill. The president vetoes it. Congress overrides the veto. The bil
Bess [88]

Answer:

Checks and balances

Explanation:

The veto was first applied by President George Washington on April 5, 1792, and the first successful overcoming of the veto by Congress occurred on March 3, 1845 (veto by President John Tyler). At the same time, in the entire history of the US presidency, a total of 1,508 vetoes have been introduced (an average of 6.7 veto per year) (excluding the so-called “pocket veto” - a pocket veto that cannot be overcome), and 1117 of them were overcome. The fact that only 7.3% of the bills that the US President vetoed was eventually passed by the US Congress, clearly indicates the effectiveness of this manifestation of checks and balances (veto rights).

4 0
3 years ago
The bloodless, or Glorious, revolution in 1688 Answers: a. Encouraged nobles in their quest to recreate a feudal society. b. End
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

C: Placed Mary and William, both Protestants, on the throne.

Explanation:

 The Glorrious Revolution, also known as The Revolution of 1688, occurred in England, for religious and political motives, and it changed the way England was governed. King James II was overthown and replaced by his daughter, Mary. <em>Now the monarchy was losing power and the parliament was gaining more, which was a sign of the beginning of a political democracy.</em>

3 0
4 years ago
PLEASE HELP
bearhunter [10]


Post a picture of your map, this is probably a regents question I’ve seen before.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the conflict in Israel and Palestine emerge from competing national movements?
Musya8 [376]
As the periodic bloodshed continues in the Middle East, the search for an equitable solution must come to grips with the root cause of the conflict. The conventional wisdom is that, even if both sides are at fault, the Palestinians are irrational “terrorists” who have no point of view worth listening to. Our position, however, is that the Palestinians have a real grievance: their homeland for over a thousand years was taken, without their consent and mostly by force, during the creation of the state of Israel. And all subsequent crimes — on both sides — inevitably follow from this original injustice.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did the Supreme Court case Gibbons v. Odgen demonstrate
    9·1 answer
  • What allowed Christianity to spread quickly through the Roman Empire
    8·1 answer
  • "what characteristic appears to be the major distinction between the two agarian zones in 18th century europe?"
    5·1 answer
  • What type of shelters were found in the Hohokam village in the Southwest Desert region
    8·2 answers
  • Why is Climate in southern alaska milder than climate in montana
    10·1 answer
  • John Rolfe and John Smith were associated with the colony of ______
    9·2 answers
  • What type of government does the United States have? *
    13·1 answer
  • Roger walks into a music store. Music from a popular song is playing from speakers mounted along the walls of the store. When Ro
    5·1 answer
  • Which option represents the example that is most similar to the one thought underlined in the passage?
    15·1 answer
  • Which best describes nativism in the untied states in the 1800s
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!