Answer:
To understand the reason the United States is both a republic and a democracy let us first define the terms and then see if the United States fits in.
A republic is a form of government that is governed by the citizens. It is not led by a monarch or an aristocrat or a despot. It is "the government of the people and for the people." It is not an outsider-imposed form of government.
Similarly, a democracy is a system of government by the whole citizens who elect some persons to represent them in the government. It is also "the government of the people, by the people, and for the people," according to popular definition.
Therefore, the United States fits the definition of a republic and a democracy. It is actually a federal democratic republic where Congress exercises supreme authority on behalf of all US citizens. Congressmen and women are elected periodically by the citizens.
The above definitions show the dependence of a democracy on the republican form of government. This implies that a republic is supposed to be a democracy. But if it is not, a democracy must be at least a republic, otherwise, it is not a democracy.
Explanation:
If the citizens have the supreme power and delegate authority to elected representatives, who make decisions on their behalf, then it is a republic.
Answer:
B an elected legislature
Explanation:
An elected legislature is the feature of colonial self-government this charter established because people were elected by the freeman of the colonies and these elected people act as a representative of the colonist people. With this legislature, the well Governing of the Province and Territories will be possible by mutual decisions taken by the representatives in the legislature.
The Edict of Fontainebleau, often known as the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, was a decree issued by French King Louis XIV on October 22, 1685.
By issuing it, Louis XIV nullified the Edict of Nantes and commanded that Protestant schools and Huguenot churches be destroyed. It expelled all Huguenots from France in favour of the Reformed strand of Protestantism.
The Edict of Fontainebleau is compared by many historians on a similar lines with the Expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492 and the Expulsion of the Moriscos in 1609-1614.
All three incidents has been looked through the lens of history as an outbursts of religious intolerance.
To know more about Edict of Nantes here:
brainly.com/question/15270929
#SPJ1
The answer for this is:
The Dutch settled in New Netherlands because d. they wanted to get rich from the fur trade
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
1. He was worried that the judicial branch had given itself too much power. Why did Robert Livingston and James Monroe go to France to meet with the French foreign minister? Jefferson decided as president he didn't have the authority to buy Louisiana
2.Why was New Orleans important to settlers in the western regions of the U.S ? Because New Orleans was a very important trading port. ... The New Orleans was very important for importing and exporting goods;Mississippi River was a major transportation for settlers and good to ship items east.
3.I don't think the French believed that the Louisiana Territory was important land for their country because they offered all of Louisiana to the Americans very easily and at a cheap price ($15 million to double the size of the U.S.) when the Americans just wanted the New Orleans territory.
HOPE THIS HELPS
