1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
13

Which statement offers the BEST explanation for why General Sherman was more destructive on his march through South Carolina tha

n he was in North Carolina?
A) The Union was seeking revenge for the Battle of Fort Sumter.
B) General Sherman failed to supervise his troops adequately while in South Carolina.
C) South Carolina was viewed as a prime target because they were the first state to secede from the Union.
D) General Sherman was seeking revenge for Union soldiers killed in South Carolina's prisoner of war camps.
History
2 answers:
Ipatiy [6.2K]3 years ago
6 0
I think the answer is <span>C
This shows why Sherman attacked more of South Carolina than North Carolina
</span>
Andrew [12]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is C) South Carolina was viewed as a prime target because they were the first state to secede from the Union.
You might be interested in
Which statement best completes the timeline?
Lena [83]
Is A I took the test hope this helps ;)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is an example of what a physical map is? Will give brainliest!!!!
stellarik [79]

Answer:

a physical map will show different land forms such as mountains and rivers and lakes

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
When he inherited his father’a kingdom, Alexander the Great:
timama [110]
The correct answer is A. 
7 0
3 years ago
Explain how the territorial expansion of the United States in the first half of the 19th century reveal deep divisions in Americ
Karolina [17]
<span>The expansion brought up the issue of slavery, which divided both the North and the South. The North had industrialized itself, creating less of a need for slavery, and they for the most part were against slavery. The South still used slaves for their plantations, and they wanted to keep slavery to reap profits. The Supreme Court tried to absolve the issue of slavery in Dred Scott vs. Sandford, but this only angered the North more. This issue was one that eventually led towards the Civil War.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What are the opponents of liberalism in the 1800s?
stich3 [128]

the opponents of liberalism was The absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings Prevalent in the Middle Ages

and Later on, the fiercest opponents were corrupt

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Toussaint L'Overtture led a revolt that eventually resulted in independence for what country
    5·2 answers
  • What are stack timelines called​
    9·1 answer
  • What makes the Moon landing a conspiracy theory?​
    15·1 answer
  • Why did muslims consider christians and jews people cal.led of the book
    12·1 answer
  • What are the two chambers of the United Nations??
    14·2 answers
  • Why were colonial citizens able to influence the laws that governed them?
    7·1 answer
  • Hamilton argued, “A new government, constructed on free principles, is always weak, and must stand in need of the props of a fir
    9·1 answer
  • • Pull back troops on the Western Front
    8·1 answer
  • Using the trial fact file do you think louis’s trial will be a fair one explain why
    8·1 answer
  • Identify three details that support the following main idea: The civil war devestated the south
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!