<h2><u><em>The progressive force of the early 20th century in Washington stemmed partially from the women's club movement which offered opportunities for leadership and political power to tens of thousands of women in the Pacific Northwest region.</em></u></h2><h2><u><em></em></u></h2><h2><u><em>also Shorter working hours every day and more pay per hour of work.</em></u></h2>
Culture, history, religion, language, and territory are elements of nationalism
Many people said that Great nations always remember what their ancestors have contributed for them
hope this helps
In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
B. a poor measure of economic activities i think
A similarity would be that the people have a voice in government.
