Answer:
I m'not sad but I would take these points thank you ❤️
My theory is- The job in which few are employed maybe the job doesn’t have a high demand therefore more people would not want to work for it compared the job that maybe has a high demand would most likely to have more openings.
Answer:
i=4%
Explanation:
this problem is possible to solve applying the principle of future value, keep in mind the next formula:
where FV is future value, PV is the present value, i is the periodic interest rate and n is the number of periods. So applying to this particular problem we have:
the difference here is that we must solve n so we can do:
so i=4%
Answer:
Any amount above $88,000
Explanation:
$ 95,00
Cash $90,000
liquidation expenses ($8,000)
<u>Liabilities ($170,000)</u>
net ($88,000)
The partnerships needs to sell its noncash assets for at least $88,000 to cover its liquidation costs and liabilities. Any additional cash received through the sale of the noncash assets should be distributed in the liquidation ratio 2:4:4.
E.g. they sell the noncash assets for $90,000, they will distribute $2,000 (=$90,000 - $88,000):
- Perry x 20% = $400
- Quincy x 40% = $800
- Renquist x 40% = $800
Answer: double-dividend hypothesis
Explanation: The double dividend hypothesis is the theory that proposes that environmental taxes can improve the environment by reducing pollution and increase economic efficiency at the same time. This is because the use of environmental tax revenues can be channeled into reducing other taxes such as income taxes that deform labor supply and saving decisions. In other words, If the parties that are generating these negative benefits to others would be taxed heavily for these effects, they would have an incentive to reduce production of whatever is causing the negative externality.
