Answer:
$718,400
Explanation:
For computation of total amount of cash payments first we need to find out the decrease in merchandise, purchases and increases in accounts payable which is shown below:-
Decrease in merchandise = Balance at the beginning of the year - Balance at the end of the year
= $218,000 - $204,200
= $13,800
Purchases = Cost of goods sold - Decrease in merchandise
= $738,000 - $13,800
= $724,200
Increase in Accounts Payable = Accounts Payable balance at the end of the year - Accounts payable at the beginning of the year
= $102,000 - $96,200
= $5,800
Cash paid for merchandise = Purchases - Increase in Accounts Payable
= $724,200 - $5,800
= $718,400
Answer:
The resulting CA percentage for the week to the nearest number is 94%
Explanation:
CA refers to Commitment Adherence.
Commitment Adherence (CA) is a way to calculate the reliability of an employee in relation to how much time they put into their work.
Put differently, it is a mathematical comparison between how much time you stated that you were going to work versus the actual amount worked. This concept is prevalent with people who use clock-in and clock-out system to measure productivity.
Step 1
The formula for calculating Commitment Adherence (CA) is:
(Serviced Minutes - Excused Non-Serviced Minutes) / (Posted Minutes + Released Minutes)
When you log out at about 5 minutes early it translates to 83% because each interval is 30 minutes. So 23/30 = 83%
Step 2
There are 8 intervals. 5 of them are 100% each. Thus total intervals for the week equal
(5*100%)+(3*83%) =
7.49 *30 = 224.7
Total number of intervals selected =
8*30 = 240
Therefore commitment adherence = 224.7/240
= 0.94%
Cheers!
<span>An opportunity cost is the value or benefit that must be given up to acquire or achieve something else. In this case whatever you choose (Coke, Dr.Pepper or 7-UP) everything would be free , at zero cost. This means that the opportunity cost in this case is zero, because the drink is free.</span>
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
Answer:
The answer is C. longer inventory sits on the firm's shelves
Explanation:
The Inventory turnover is the number of times inventory is sold or used during a given period of time.
The formula is:
cost of goods sold/average inventory.
A lower inventory turnover means weak sales(declining sales) and excess inventory remaining in the warehouse while a higher inventory turnover means it is taking a firm short time to sell its goods(inventory)
