Answer: engagement
Explanation:
Engaged employees are not those who work hard because they have to but they are the one who actual understand the goal and the mission of the company and they make it their own. They are personal invested in seeing the company reach that goal.
Usually these employees are motivated by the investment that the company also put on them.
They emotionally care for the company that they work for and for them it's not about just getting paid for the work that they do or being moved into the next level but it's about seeing the company succeed.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Robert de La Salle not right
The rhetorical techniques used by Thomas Paine in the Common Sense are ethos, logos, and pathos, as well as diction and syntax.
Paine is able to make the case that the United States should work toward their independence from England by utilising a constructed argument and rhetorical devices. The aim of Paine's essay was to persuade the colonies to declare their independence from Great Britain. His use of rhetorical questions and a simile to show unfair British policy is particularly powerful.
Paine makes use of it to create emotion, describe relationships, and provide contrasts or similarities. In this instance, he creates a list of what he considers to be Common Sense using syntax. He discusses how a man ought to be able to set aside all bias, concentrate on the most important issues, and extend his vision.
Know more about Thomas Paine here
brainly.com/question/16576227
#SPJ1
