1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sophie [7]
3 years ago
7

According to roger williams, how did the english usually justify their attacks on the indians?

History
2 answers:
Korvikt [17]3 years ago
8 0

According to Roger Williams, the English usually justify their attacks against the Indians by saying that they were only defending themselves. Even if they were colonizers and settled on lands that did not belong to them, they saw themselves superior to the native Americans whom they called the savages. With their religion and their European education, they thought they had the right to dominate this uncivilized population and therefore did not accept that the Indians attack them to recover their lands.

<h3>Further explanation</h3>

Roger Williams was an English pastor from the early 17th century who started his career in the United States in Boston, in the Massachusetts colony. Disappointed by the English church, he had become puritanical and wanted to defend his new ideas in America. Unfortunately, he was not be received by the American preachers who were against his philosophy, especially on the intervention of the state in religion issue. Roger Williams thought that the state should stay neutral and not deal with people's beliefs.

His conflicts with other pastors of Massachusetts forced him to move elsewhere. He decided to start a new life in the middle of an Indian community. He became their friend quickly and defended them all his life. It was him who created the state of Rhode Island and the Providence plantation where Native Americans were respected. Roger Williams was sure that America belonged to them and that the Europeans had to do everything to live in harmony with them.

<h3>Learn more</h3>
  1. John Quincy Adams policy towards Native Americans: brainly.com/question/10271912
  2. French and Indian war: brainly.com/question/4722224
  3. The 13 colonies: brainly.com/question/4838130

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade: 9-12

Subject: History

Chapter: Empire and Identity in the American Colonies

Keywords: puritanism, Indian culture, Indian religion, 13 colonies, Roger Williams

Ivenika [448]3 years ago
3 0
They claimed that their wars were defensive. Whenever they attacked they would claim that the Natives had committed a transgression or had attacked first or were a threat or anything similar. This enabled them to do terrible things and still look like heroes in the eyes of the public.
<span />
You might be interested in
Why were the Cherokees removed from their location in Georgia and sent west?
kipiarov [429]

The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for arable land during the rampant growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on Cherokee land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners harbored toward American Indians.

In 1830, the U.S. Federal government passed the Indian Removal Act. This Act gave the president authority to make treaties with the Cherokee, Choctaw, Muscogee-Creek, Seminole, and Chickasaw Nations. Its purpose was to move these entire societies from their land in the southeast to land west of the Mississippi River.

6 0
1 year ago
Which of the following best describes the term globalization?
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

c.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
The president of the senate is both the elected presiding officer of the house and the acknowledged leader of its majority party
sweet-ann [11.9K]
False
He is the speaker of the House
4 0
4 years ago
In the 1930's, one factor that accounted for the westward migration of farmers from the great plains was_______?
Luden [163]

dust bowl is your answer


3 0
3 years ago
Read this quote from Yasser Arafat, then answer the question:
Over [174]
The quote "Palestine is the cement that holds the Arab world together, or it is the explosive that blows it apart."means that Palestine has the potential to make the Arab world peaceful and collaborate with each other, but that it also can incite the Arab world to violence.

So the following statement is true:
If Palestinian peace is not achieved, all Middle East nations will descend into chaos and violence. - it corresponds to the second part of my sentence

and this statement is not implied: All the nations of the Middle East look to Palestine and its leaders for guidance


7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Antigone is willing to die in order to bury her brother. Why Is his burial so important to her?
    8·1 answer
  • Is it better to sacrifice one man that another?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the United States invade the island of Grenada? to prevent a Communist government from spreading to other Caribbean isla
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these branches of Islam has always had the majority of followers since the Sunni-Shia split?
    15·2 answers
  • Margols were mounted warriors from Asia who established the largest land empire in history true or false
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Continental Army win the Revolutionary War at the Battle of Yorktown? Both the Continental Army and the French army
    6·1 answer
  • Were african americans treated as equals after the civil war
    5·1 answer
  • During Andrew Jackson’s presidency, the Democratic Party supported policies that expanded government spending to solve Americans
    12·2 answers
  • How did slavery lead to the civil war.
    8·1 answer
  • What was MOST important to the early economic development of the Mid-Atlantic Colonies?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!