1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
barxatty [35]
1 year ago
6

Why were the Cherokees removed from their location in Georgia and sent west?

History
1 answer:
kipiarov [429]1 year ago
6 0

The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for arable land during the rampant growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on Cherokee land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners harbored toward American Indians.

In 1830, the U.S. Federal government passed the Indian Removal Act. This Act gave the president authority to make treaties with the Cherokee, Choctaw, Muscogee-Creek, Seminole, and Chickasaw Nations. Its purpose was to move these entire societies from their land in the southeast to land west of the Mississippi River.

You might be interested in
“Colorism is a colonization of the mind” what does this quote means??
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Colorism is a colonization of the mind” what does this quote means??

Explanation:

Skin color matters because we are a visual species and we respond to one another based on the way we physically present. Add to that the “like belongs with like” beliefs most people harbor, and the race-based prejudices human beings have attached to certain skin colors, and we come to present-day society, where skin color becomes a loaded signifier of identity and value. In the U.S. in particular, where we have an extremely diverse population, race still matters, but color matters, too.

In the 21st century, as America becomes less white and the multiracial community—formed by interracial unions and immigration—continues to expand, color will be even more significant than race in both public and private interactions. Why? Because a person’s skin color is an irrefutable visual fact that is impossible to hide, whereas race is a constructed, quasi-scientific classification that is often only visible on a government form.

6 0
3 years ago
List the three-part government of the British colonies and tell what each part did?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Legislative - The legislative branch is made up of the two houses of Congress—the Senate and the House of Representatives. The most important duty of the legislative branch is to make laws

self governing - A self-governing colony is a colony with an elected government in which elected rulers are able to make most decisions without referring to the colonial power with nominal control of the colony

proprietary - Under the proprietary system, individuals or companies were granted commercial charters by the monarchs of the Kingdom of England to establish colonies. These proprietors then selected the governors and other officials in the colony
4 0
3 years ago
In Roman times most people lived in small cities, while during the Middle Ages most people lived in the countryside. All of the
Evgen [1.6K]
C. 
 is the right answer i think because in the middle ages most people live in the countryside .

good luck

4 0
3 years ago
How did World War I help bring about the Russian Revolution?
Artyom0805 [142]
The war brought about inflation within the country. This caused many people to rebel against the government. The rebellion started the revolution. <span />
8 0
3 years ago
In the space below, write a 500-word comparative essay evaluating the key similarities and differences between the world’s major
vodomira [7]

Form of government, political form, regime of government, political regime, system of government, political system, system of government, model of government or political model are some of the diverse ways of naming an essential concept of political science and the theory of State or constitutional right. It refers to the model of organization of constitutional power adopted by a State in terms of the relationship between the different powers. The way in which political power is structured to exercise its authority in the State, coordinating all the institutions that form it, makes each form of government requires regulatory mechanisms that are characteristic of it.

There are very different nomenclatures to denominate the different forms of government, from the theorists of Antiquity to the Contemporary Age; At present, three types of classifications are usually used:

• The elective character or not of the head of state defines a classification, between republics (elective) and monarchies (non-elective).

• The degree of freedom, pluralism and political participation defines another classification, between democratic, authoritarian and totalitarian systems, depending on whether they allow the exercise of discrepancy and political opposition to a greater or lesser degree or deny more or less radically the possibility of dissidence (establishing a single-party regime, or different types of exceptional regimes, such as dictatorships or military juntas); At the same time, the electoral system through which the popular will expresses itself in participatory systems has had very different historical configurations (direct democracy or assembly, indirect or representative democracy, census or restricted suffrage, universal male suffrage or of both sexes, different determinations of the age of majority, racial segregation, inclusion or not of immigrants, and others), as well as very different ways of altering or distorting it (borgo rotido, gerrymandering, electoral fraud, pucherazo).

• The existing relationship between the head of the State, the government and the parliament defines another classification, between presidentialisms and parliamentarisms (with many degrees or mixed forms between one and the other).

These three classifications are not exclusive, but complement each other, so that a republic can be democratic (United States or South Africa) or non-democratic (China or North Korea); a republican democracy can be parliamentary (Germany or India), semi-presidential (France or Russia) or presidential (Argentina or South Korea); and a monarchy can be democratic and parliamentary (Spain, United Kingdom or Japan), undemocratic (Saudi Arabia or Vatican City) or be placed in intermediate positions (Morocco), very usually qualified in a more or less anachronistic way with terms of the historical forms of the monarchy (feudal monarchy, authoritarian monarchy, absolute monarchy).

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What action by Washington did the Federalists but not the Democratic- Republicans support?
    8·1 answer
  • What factors might help a country lose a war
    5·2 answers
  • based on what you have read, select each group below whose equal rights were ensured by the civil rights act
    13·1 answer
  • Whose Presidency was MOST concerned with fulfilling the country's Manifest Destiny?
    5·1 answer
  • Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddd hhhhheeeeelllllllllpppppppp
    11·1 answer
  • Describe how the Executive Branch has power over the Judicial Branch?
    11·1 answer
  • Helppppp ill give brainn
    10·1 answer
  • In your own words, explain what “ Capitalism “ is <br><br><br><br> will mark as brainly
    14·1 answer
  • How did European countries view war in the late 1800's and early 1900's
    13·1 answer
  • In Wesberry v. Sanders, James Sanders argued that the county unit system gave too much power to
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!