Answer:
The Silk Road was an example of great creativity, ingenuity and cultural spread due to the immense amount of trade and people to people contact that took place through that route.
Explanation:
The Silk road was an ancient trading route that connected the China with Central Asia, modern-day Pakistan, all the way to the Middle east, Mediterranean and parts of Europe.
The Silk route connected different cultures, languages, trades and ideas and gave rise to technology transfer, knowledge sharing and deeply connected the East with the West.
At the time, Europe was very backward while the Middle East and China were the most developed regions in the world.
The cultural spread and creativity that spread through this network are still evident in other parts of the world.
The answer is nationalism. Both leaders wanted to free their
countries from the foreign rul. They had gathered all their supporters in order
to unify them under King and stage an uprising. Both leaders became successful and
were able to regain sovereignty in their respective countries
Answer:
The most powerful person in ancient Egypt was the pharaoh. The pharaoh was the political and religious leader of the Egyptian people, holding the titles: 'Lord of the Two Lands' and 'High Priest of Every Temple'. He owned all of the land, made laws, collected taxes, and defended Egypt against foreigners. The pharaohs of the New Kingdom used their wealth to build massive temples to the gods. The city of Thebes continued to be the cultural center of the empire. The Temple of Luxor was built at Thebes and grand additions were made to the Temple of Karnak. The unity and strength which characterized the 18th and 19th Dynasties steadily was lost during the 20th. The New Kingdom ended when the priests of Amun grew strong enough to assert their power at Thebes and divide the country between their rule and the pharaoh's at the city of Per-Ramesses.
<em>I apoligize for the long answer, i hope this helped out some~ <3</em>
<em>-Dream</em>
After watching this year's presidential debates, I would say I knew less about the candidates than I knew beforehand. What I saw made me suspect the entire process, "How can we in modern society get along if the two men competing for the most distinguished position of power in the world can't even be civil toward each other." I hope that in future debates, especially the presidential debates, we can find a way to communicate more civilly to strive towards a greater tomorrow.
