1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeu [11.5K]
4 years ago
12

If the government were to use eminent domain to seize personal property for a public park, would this be acceptable, according t

o the Fifth Amendment?
Yes, because the Fifth Amendment states that anyone can take property for any reason.
Yes, because the property is going to be used for a public good or service.
No, because eminent domain cannot apply here.
No, because the government did not get the owner’s permission to take the property.
History
1 answer:
I am Lyosha [343]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Yes, because the property is going to be use for a public good or service.

Explanation:

the fifth Amendment. states that the government can seize private property for public use. if the property is going to be used for public use and there is a compensation provided for the owner of the property. If the owner refuses to sale it for public use, then the government can use its power of eminent domain and condemn the property, to force the sale of it for public use.

You might be interested in
Why did Americans choose to move to cities
Troyanec [42]
They moved to the city so they would have an easier time finding work
3 0
2 years ago
What group of people had the right to vote in colonial America?
Pani-rosa [81]
C all white men who owned property
6 0
3 years ago
Help!! I’ll give brainliest to whoever replies first
Wittaler [7]

Explanation:

The king did not respond to the petition to Congress' satisfaction and eight months later on July 6, 1775, the Second Continental Congress adopted a resolution entitled “Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms.” Written by John Dickinson and Thomas

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Analyze the reason that the Supreme Court found the burning of a flag to be protected free speech as it did in Texas v. Johns
aev [14]

Answer:

d hopefully

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
What was one cause of the unparalleled material abundance of the united states in the 1950s? question 6 options:?
pickupchik [31]
One cause of the unparalleled material abundance of the United States in the 1950s is the population where in the population likely increase for about thirty million-- contributing to the unparalleled material abundance in the United States during the 1950s.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Vietnam War affected the US economy during the early 1970s by
    12·2 answers
  • In regard to regulating companies Roosevelt wanted them to serve
    11·2 answers
  • Think about what you know of the situation in Europe in the early 1900s.
    9·2 answers
  • Cause of the European industrial revolution
    15·1 answer
  • In the 1950s the Chinese government
    13·2 answers
  • In addition to replacing the president if necessary, it's the duty of the vice president to A. review laws before the president
    12·1 answer
  • Which were results of the Industrial Revolution? Select all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • Which led to dust storms during the 1930s?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did Roosevelt say he wanted to increase the number of judges on the Supreme Court?
    12·2 answers
  • What are United Colonies today?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!