It was known as the new right
the social changes that came about as a result of the civil rights movement and the feminist agitation such as the right to abortion did not make everybody happy in the USA. these unhappy individuals consisted of wealthy businessmen, and prominent church voices. They joined hand to form a conservative coalition known as the new Right.
Answer:
The correct answers are :
B. It was very difficult to change membership in an estate ( moving up to the next estate was very hard to do)
D. French aristocrats belonged to the Second Estate.
Explanation:
The French before the revolution put the societies into three Estates which were the:
The first estate was made up of the church system (clergy). This estate owns almost a massive 10% of the land
The Second comprises of the nobility or aristocrats who are known to have fought the knight. The second estate has the privilege to move to the first estate.
The third is made up of the commoners.
However, the 4th estate was created which was known as the DOD (Department of Defense)and the press
Answer:
Autocracy, Oligarchy, Democracy.
Explanation:
The principles of equality, respect for human rights, and the practice of holding universal suffrage periodic and legitimate elections are fundamental elements of democracy. Democracy is a form of system in which citizens elect the rulers.
Oligarchy simply referred to the government by the few, particularly despotic power exercised for cynical or self-centered purposes by a small and privileged community. Oligarchies in which ruling party leaders are affluent or exert their influence using their wealth.
An autocracy also defined as a single person party is a form of government in which an autocrat holds supreme and absolute power. This autocrat's decisions are subject to neither external legal constraints nor regularized common control structures.
Answer:
He promoted, then, a limited government that had to be accountable for its actions, and opposed the idea of an absolute monarch or any other absolute government, believing that someone with unlimited authority that could make arbitrary decisions was very unlikely to protect people's natural rights
