Answer:
Well I don't know what poem this is about, but most times when poems are written in couplets, it's to add a beat and rhythm and to influence the mood in a certain way (mostly to create suspense). Personalize this to whatever poem this dicusses.
Explanation:
<em>Hope this helps, Have a good day!! :)</em>
1. The speaker watches as the Raven flies in and perches on the bust of Pallas.
2. The speaker asks the raven if he'll ever get over the misery of losing his love Lenore.
3. The speaker wants to know if he'll ever meet Lenore in Heaven.
4. The speaker gets angry at the raven and shouts at it to fly away.
5. The speaker feels like his soul is trapped in the Raven's shadow.
I believe this is the correct order, although I really don't remember the part where 'the speaker imagines that angels have arrived and spread perfume in the room', so I cannot help you with that one.
Answer:
i would chose D. or the one on the right second one down
Explanation:
if you do process of elimination it's the only one that supports the claim
Hope this helps! UwU
Answer:
Nietzsche’s philosophical thoughts on morality argue that a moral code is not in our nature, while
Zimbardo’s argument is that we shouldn’t expect our decisions to be
influenced by morality alone. Nietzsche’s thoughts on morality are
grounded in opposition to Christianity. He begins his argument by
quoting from the Bible, “If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out,” before
labeling the Christian idea as “stupidity” (Paragraph 1). Nietzsche argues
that sensuality is in opposition to Christianity and that the church
“always wanted the destruction of its enemies; we, we immoralists and
Antichristians” (Paragraph 5), adding that “Life has come to an end
where the ‘kingdom of God’ begins” (Paragraph 8). In contrast, Zimbardo
bases his argument on science and proposes that the electric shock
experiment by psychologist Stanley Milgram “provides several lessons
about how situations can foster evil” (Paragraph 5). He also uses
conclusions from a 1974 experiment by Harvard anthropologist John
Watson, as well as his own simulated jail experiment, the 1971 Stanford
Prison Experiment, to help support his argument.
Beacuase there is too much pick and he also didnt have time cause he neede to pay the debt he was in.
