Anton Chekhov conceived of this play, which turned out to be his last, as a comedy,designating it “A Comedy in Four Acts” and even emphasizing to the Moscow Art Theatre that the last act should be “merry and frivolous.” He suggested that some portions were even farcical. Nevertheless, most interpretations and theatrical productions have emphasized its tragic aspects. It is understandable why the playwright’s intentions have been largely disregarded; the subject is a serious and depressing one including the family’s loss of their ancestral home and removal from it and other sad developments as well. The destruction of the orchard also represents the destruction of illusions—sad, to be sure, but perhaps hopeful.
Thus, as the inevitable change in society with the dawning of the 20th Century comes, the play represents this time period and portrays an end of an aristocratic era with both tragic and comic elements. The play is best characterized as a tragicomedy.
Does<span> not </span>do<span> away with all the article problems, but it reduces ... </span>This excerpt<span> contains nine errors in article and singular/plural noun </span>uses<span>.</span>
I am thinking.. accomplice?
Answer:
Negative Violation.
Explanation:
Expectancy violation theory tell about a certain way a particular person what's you to behave,but you act differently which violates their expectations of you.
We have positive and negative expectancy violation.Thse are various various ways in which the violator is been seen.
A positive expectancy violation increases the Attraction of the violator. This can be seen as commendable since your behavior is commendable.
On the other hand a Negative Expectancy Violation decreases the Attraction of the violator.This right her isn't a good one to start with. Your behavior is questionable when this occur and no good commendation comes along.
Thank you..
