The reason why the Fugitive Slave Law and the Dred Scott decision made Black Abolitionists take more direct action against slavery because it meant that those who escaped slavery were at risk of being taken back.
<h3>How did Abolitionists react to the Fugitive slave law?</h3><h3 />
When the Fugitive Slave Law was passed, Black Abolitionists were outraged because it meant that people who escaped slavery in the South, could be captured from the North and taken back to slavery.
This was also the case with the Dred Scott decision which ruled that Black people could not sue for their freedom. Black Abolitionists then engaged in more direct action against slavery to ensure that people who escaped slavery would be free forever.
Find out more on the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 at brainly.com/question/16683622
#SPJ1
Answer:
Founded in 1619, the Virginia General Assembly is still in existence as the oldest legislature in the New World. In colonial Virginia, the lower house of the legislature was called the House of Burgesses. Together with the Governor's Council, the House of Burgesses made up the "General Assembly".
The type of structure is used in the text is chronological because the <span> record of events starting with the earliest and following the order in which they occurred.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
Answer:
Woodrow Wilson is best known as the World War I president who earned a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to found the League of Nations. A progressive reformer who fought against monopolies and child labor, he served two terms starting in 1913.
But Wilson was also a segregationist who wrote a history textbook praising the Confederacy and, in particular, the Ku Klux Klan. As president, he rolled back hard-fought economic progress for Black Americans, overseeing the segregation of multiple agencies of the federal government.
While Wilson was lauded for his role in World War I, historians and activists have long called attention to his other actions. And institutions have grappled with how to respond to this side of his legacy. In June 2020, Monmouth University announced it would rename its Woodrow Wilson Hall. And after years of protests, Princeton University said it would remove his name from its prestigious public policy school, explaining that his segregationist attitudes and policies made Wilson an “especially inappropriate namesake.” In places like Washington, D.C., historians and parents have called for removing his name from public high schools.
Explanation:
I hope this helped you.
Please mark Brainliest.
Have a great day!!!!!!!!!!!
