The answer is<u> "Anthropologist".</u>
Anthropology refers to the study of what makes us human. Anthropologists adopt a wide strategy to understanding the a wide range of parts of the human experience, which we call comprehensive quality. They consider the past, through archaic exploration, to perceive how human gatherings lived hundreds or thousands of years back and what was essential to them. They consider what makes up our natural bodies and hereditary qualities, and additionally our bones, eating routine, and wellbeing. Anthropologists likewise contrast people and different creatures (frequently, different primates like monkeys and chimpanzees) to perceive what we have in the same way as them and what makes us interesting.
Answer:
C). People are surprisingly likely to follow the orders of not only real authority figures but also groups of ordinary individuals.
Explanation:
The famous psychologist Stanley Milgram's research on testing and observing the 'subjects when they used a 'shock generator' displayed that 'people are surprisingly likely to follow the orders of not only real authority figures but also the groups of ordinary individuals.' His study revealed that <u>people show 'obedience' while following the commands, orders, or suggestions of the authority figures while their 'conscience' is mirrored when they follow 'a group of common individuals.'</u> Therefore, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Cops arresting black or white humans with the cause of their race/ ask google you will find the latest story
It is important to know the competence of the receiver so that you can write the letter in a way that they can understand.
<h3>What is the purpose of writing a letter?</h3>
- To convey information to the reader.
If you write a letter to someone in such a way that they would be unable to understand it, then you would have failed in the objective of conveying information.
You therefore need to know the person's competence level so that you can write the letter appropriately.
Find out more on letter writing at brainly.com/question/3602860.
Answer:
Smith probably wins, because parties for whose protection a regulatory statute has been enacted often can recover amounts paid under a contract declared illegal by the statute.
Explanation:
