The statement that is not true about Archbishop William Laud's action is that "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglican."
This is evident in that Archbishop William Laud was famous for being an Anglican in terms of doctrine.
He used his position to ensure people in England and Scotland practiced the Anglican doctrine, which sparked riots in Scotland, and later led to Bishop wars.
The major action he did was to push protestants orthodox practices to the Puritans.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "He had Catholic leanings which infuriated Anglicans."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/715752
There is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.
<h3>What happened in Plessy V Ferguson?</h3>
The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases of Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the Louisiana state law allowed for "equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored race"
<h3>What happened in Brown v. Board of Education?</h3>
The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases Brown v. Board of Education favored Oliver Brown whose daughter was not allowed to attend a school near her home due to discriminate against the black students.
In conclusion, there is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.
Read more about blacks discrimination
<em>brainly.com/question/13608616</em>
The first one medicare provides health care for older ppl
Generally they can no loger drive car in insurgent or formerly insurgent controlled areas, they must walk right along the side of the road so they don't get blown up by land mines. Generally many fled because land mines ruined their lives even after the insurgents left.
<span>Showed workers that organized labor was powerful.
</span><span>
Showed them the power of organized labor
</span>
