Im gonna say that it’s either the first one or the last one.
The correct answer is B) The counterclaim is supported by strong evidence.
Even if the claim is valid (which excludes option A), it does not offer other evidence than the author's perception that crowds disturb the city and looks for the audience to agree on that. This lack of strong evidence supporting the author's claim also invalidates option C.
On the other hand, there is a counterclaim (excluding option D) that actually offers strong evidence supporting it. The fact that the festival attracts lots of tourists and generates revenue for the city, including the local businesses that support the festival, is strong evidence that supports the claim that the festival should be maintained.
So the only correct answer is option B.
Answer:
The three major parts of effective communication, also called the Rhetorical Triangle, are ethos, patho s, and logos, and they provide the foundation for a solid argument. As a reader and a listener, you must be able to recognize how writers and speakers depend upon these three rhetorical elements in their efforts to communicate.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think its really good! It's a good length, and it sounds like you're speaking from your heart. I would give it an A!
Explanation:
Answer:
You could say something like, "In her office, Mrs. Gupta is there."
Hope this helps!
