1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisov135 [29]
3 years ago
12

The atlantic charter demonstrated american and british unity seeking to restore peace and self determinism in europe after world

war 2
History
2 answers:
algol133 years ago
8 0
Yes, it is true that the <span>atlantic charter demonstrated american and British unity seeking to restore peace and self determinism in Europe after world war 2, however it was conceived before the United States officially entered the war. </span>
Alika [10]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is C) seeking to restore peace and self-determinism in Europe.

<em>The Atlantic Charter demonstrated America and British unity in seeking to restore peace and self-determinism in Europe. </em>

On August 14, 1941, the United States and Great Britain issued a joint declaration known as the Atlantic Charter Declaration. The United States had not entered the war when Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill met in Placentia Bay. They agreed in not taking territorial advantage from the result of World War II and demonstrated that the United States and England unity in seeking to restore peace and self-determinism in Europe.

The other options of the question were, a) pursuing a policy of imperialism, b) punishing Germany for damages during the war, and d) seeking to control new nations.  

You might be interested in
Reasons for not going to war in 1861
attashe74 [19]
Real reasons for the Civil War:
This is well-reasoned document concerning the reasons the Civil War occurred.

Many people think the Civil War of 1860-1865 was fought over one issue alone, slavery. Nothing could actually be further from the truth. The War Between the States began because the South demanded States' rights and were not getting them.

The Congress at that time heavily favored the industrialized northern states to the point of demanding that the South sell is cotton and other raw materials only to the factories in the north, rather than to other countries. The Congress also taxed the finished materials that the northern industries produced heavily, making finished products that the South wanted, unaffordable. The Civil War should not have occurred. If the Northern States and their representatives in Congress had only listened to the problems of the South, and stopped these practices that were almost like the taxation without representation of Great Britain, then the Southern states would not have seceded and the war would not have occurred.

I know for many years, we have been taught that the Civil War was all about the abolition of slavery, but this truly did not become a major issue, with the exception of John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry, until after the Battle of Antietam in September 1862, when Abraham Lincoln decided to free the slaves in the Confederate States in order to punish those states for continuing the war effort. The war had been in progress for two years by that time.

Most southerners did not even own slaves nor did they own plantations. Most of them were small farmers who worked their farms with their families. They were fighting for their rights. They were fighting to maintain their lifestyle and their independence the way they wanted to without the United States Government dictating to them how they should behave.

Why are we frequently taught then, that the Civil War, War of Northern Aggression, War Between the States, or whatever you want to call it, was solely about slavery? That is because the history books are usually written by the winners of a war and this war was won by the Union. However, after following my family around since I was just a year old to Civil War Living History scenarios in Gettysburg and elsewhere, I have listened to both sides of the story, from those portraying historical figures, both Union and Confederate. Through listening to these people and also reading many different books, including some of the volumes of The Official Records of the Civil War, Death in September, The Insanity of It All, Every Day Life During the Civil War, and many others, I have come to the conclusion that the Civil War was about much more than abolishing the institution of slavery.

It was more about preserving the United States and protecting the rights of the individual, the very tenets upon which this country was founded. I personally think that the people who profess that the Civil War was only fought about slavery have not read their history books. I really am glad that slavery was abolished, but I don't think it should be glorified as being the sole reason the Civil War was fought. There are so many more issues that people were intensely passionate about at the time. Slavery was one of them, but it was not the primary cause of the war. The primary causes of the war were economics and states' rights.

Slavery was a part of those greater issues, but it was not the reason the Southern States seceded from the Union, nor fought the Civil War. It certainly was a Southern institution that was part of the economic system of the plantations, and because of that, it was part and parcel of the economic reasons that the South formed the Confederacy. The economic issue was one of taxation and being able to sell cotton and other raw materials where the producers wanted to, rather than where they were forced to, and at under inflated prices. Funny, it sounds very much like the reason we broke from Great Britain to begin with. The South was within their rights, but there should have been another way to solve the problem. If they had been willing to listen to Abraham Lincoln, perhaps the war could have been avoided. Lincoln had a plan to gradually free the slaves without it further hurting the plantation owners. He also had a plan to allow them to sell their products anywhere they wanted to and at a fair price. They did not choose to listen to the President, however, so they formed the Confederacy and the Civil War began.
4 0
3 years ago
The fear of a vast Y2K catastrophe in 1999 illustrates how
Olin [163]

The fear of a vast Y2K catastrophe in 1999 illustrates little the tech sector understood computers at the time. This is further explained below.

<h3>What is the Y2K catastrophe in 1999?</h3>

Generally, A Y2K calamity was predicted twenty years ago as people celebrated the new century and prepared for the possibility of widespread computer failure when the clock struck midnight on January 1, 2000.

In conclusion,  The Y2K scare in 1999 shows how poorly the IT industry understood computers at the time.

Read more about  Y2K catastrophe

brainly.com/question/5598863

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
What did the British think that would divide the colonies and shatter their morale ?
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

hey planned to invade upper New York by way of Lake Champlain and to proceed down the Hudson River to New York City.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Due to what conditions were slaves brought into brazil to work the fields
Ksivusya [100]
Many slaves were brought to Brazil due to the sugar economy, which is the primary source of income in Brazil.
8 0
3 years ago
Https://docs.go ogle.com/document/d/1cEcS594u4UUefo4GDfRWjqiXORzrYqznlI7sPTDJ39c/edit?usp=sharing
Bess [88]

Answer:

it says i need acces

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the spanish aid the slave revolt in saint domingue
    10·1 answer
  • Alexander hamilton argued that the federal government held what powers beyond its delegated authority?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the Missouri Compromise? <br><br> How did it affect our relationship with Mexico?
    6·1 answer
  • What african american leader played a major role in founding the naacp?
    8·2 answers
  • *
    6·1 answer
  • Was life better for a house slave or a field slave? Why?
    11·1 answer
  • What value does Frank Wright's work have to us? What measures would you take to preserve his buildings?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the primary goal of the colonial ommittees of Corresponidence?​
    15·1 answer
  • Which presidential candidate in 1948 lost the votes of many southern Democrats for his support of civil rights but won the elect
    6·2 answers
  • What enabled the transformation from hunter-gathering societies to farming societies?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!