Why did the japanese attack pearl harbor and how successful was the attack?

History

1 answer:

prisoha [69]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Japan moved to attack the US Navy Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor under the premise that war with the United States was inevitable, they wanted to strike first, to deliver a fatal blow to the American Navy that would impede the US from interfering in their conquests and military operations in Southeast Asia. A declaration of war was drafted, but due to delays it was delivered to the US after the attack had started on December 7, 1941. The Japanese planes inflicted terrible damage on the fleet in Hawaii, sunk several important vessels, damaged others, destroyed a hig number of aircraft and killed thousands of sailors. Nevertheless, the attack was not a full success because that day, the American carriers were not anchored at the base in Pearl Harbor, so the operation failed to achieve one of its main goals: to destroy American naval strategic capacity; the era of the aircraft carriers as the main assets of naval power had begun.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which is the most likely reason why the angelic in church was successful in gaining followers in postformation England

Veronika [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

always do what the king does

5 0

3 years ago

Which MOST accurately evaluates the arguments presented in this speech?

luda_lava [24]

Answer:

were is the speech did this come with an image?

3 0

3 years ago

What are pros and cons of environment conservation for American society

marusya05 [52]

Answer:

Health and Safety

Environmental laws protect the health and safety of humans and the environment. For example, the Clean Air Act limits emissions of pollutants, and the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act prohibits dumping of waste into U.S. ocean waters without a permit. (See References 1 and 4) Without such laws, businesses and individuals might do whatever was most convenient or cost-effective for them, rather than acting for the good of society and the environment.

Innovation

Stricter environmental laws tend to increase innovative environmentally friendly technology, writes Frank Wijen in "A Handbook of Globalization and Environmental Policy." (See Reference 5, Page 216) The demand for sustainable technology rises as companies and individuals must follow stricter environmental regulations, leading researchers and clean energy entrepreneurs to focus on developing such technologies. Ultimately, this increases the prominence of sustainable technologies, making them more accessible.

Costs

Businesses may see certain environmental laws in a negative light if they must adapt their practices and increase spending to comply with regulations. Individuals may feel inconvenienced by particular laws as well, such as a new law against fishing in a favorite spot. Conducting a cost-benefit analysis of environmental laws often proves challenging, as negative effects of not implementing these laws -- such as death, illness and ecosystem destruction -- cannot always be easily quantified in monetary terms. (See Reference 2) However, becoming more environmentally friendly may actually save businesses and individuals money in the long term, particularly by reducing waste and energy usage, despite the cost of the initial investment.

Oversights

Environmental laws that impose regulations without considering their impacts on local communities come with a serious disadvantage: lack of local support. For example, a law that commands people to stay out of a protected natural area, without recognizing that people rely on this ecosystem for their own daily needs, may not only constitute a human rights violation, but may actually backfire, says the Center for International Forestry Research. Community participation in ecosystem management helps to ensure compliance with regulations, reports CIFOR.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Hurricane Katrina! More like Hurricane _____!

frez [133]

Hurricane tortilla!

.....

6 0

3 years ago

Who established the critical idea that the monarchy power was not absolute

hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

The leading families saw their future in cooperation with the central government and worked to establish absolutist power. The most

3 0

3 years ago